Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Effectiveness of Dry Needling Versus Manual Trigger Point Release on Active Rhomboid Trigger Points
Sponsor: Riphah International University
Summary
This study compares dry needling and manual trigger point release for treating active rhomboid trigger points in 48 patients, assessing pain, ROM, and function. It addresses a gap in evidence for optimal pain management in upper back myofascial pain. Findings will guide clinical practice for more effective, evidence-based interventions.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
20 Years - 60 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
48
Start Date
2025-04-23
Completion Date
2025-12-31
Last Updated
2026-04-08
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
dry needling trigger release therapy
The dry needling intervention involved inserting sterile filiform needles directly into active rhomboid trigger points for 1-2 sessions (1 session/week) to elicit local twitch responses and relieve tension.
MANUAL TRIGGER POINT RELEASE
The manual trigger point release intervention involved applying sustained pressure to active rhomboid trigger points followed by passive stretching to release muscle tension and improve mobility.
Locations (1)
Riphah International University, Malakand
Chakdara, KPK, Pakistan