Clinical Research Directory

Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift

To compare Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift; bone grafting will be performed, followed by implant placement. Membrane perforation rates, surgical time, and bone density changes will be evaluated.

Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Neocement®

This study aims to collect real-world clinical data to gather information on the performance and safety of the Neocement® when used according to its intended purpose and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study will serve as clinical evidence for the device's clinical evaluation, targeting submission to the new Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Neocement® Inject P

This study aims to collect real-world clinical data to gather information on the performance and safety of the Neocement® Inject P when used according to its intended purpose and current clinical applications. The results of the clinical study will serve as clinical evidence for the device's clinical evaluation, targeting submission to the new Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment After Surgical Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results after surgical treatment with implant-free allograft in the treatment of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation and to assess the safety of the surgery.

The Use of Two Bone Substitutes in Adjunct to EMD for the Treatment of One- and Two-wall Intrabony Defects.

The main aim will be to evaluate the difference in PD changes at 12-month follow-up, measured from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket, comparing periodontal regeneration using two different bone substitutes, that is bovine derived xenograft granules (BioOss® Collagen) and one resorbable sponge-like hydroxyapatite collagen matrix (OssixTM Bone), in adjunct with EMD after microsurgical flap elevation. Inclusion criteria I. Men and women over or equal to the age of 18 years II. Patients in general good health in the opinion of the principal investigator as determined by medical history and clinical examination (ASA 1 or ASA-2) III. Clinical evidence of periodontitis, with one interdental area of PPD (periodontal probing depth) ≥6mm and bleeding on probing, associated one or more one-wall or two-wall intrabony periodontal defect with an intrabony component of equal or more than 3 mm, as diagnosed by periapical radiographs and clinical evaluation (excluding third molars and distal of second molars); the defect must not affect the vestibular / buccal or the lingual support bone wall (PPD lingual or vestibular / buccal \<= 3.5 mm ) of the affected teeth. IV. Patients who already underwent stage I and stage II of periodontal therapy, as described in the EFP practice guidelines (Sanz et al., 2020), within 6 months prior to assessment for eligibility V. Patients who can understand the requirements of the study and are willing and able to comply with its instructions and schedules VI. Patients who had provided written informed consent to participate in the study prior to any study procedure. Exclusion criteria I. FMPS% \> 15% at the time of recruitment II. FMBS% \> 15% at the time of recruitment III. Treatment with anticoagulant drugs (INR above 2,5) IV. Treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates V. Treatment with anticonvulsants drugs VI. patients with history of alcohol, narcotics, or drug abuse VII. Patients receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or any other immunosuppressive treatment or who have been administered radiotherapy in the last 5 years VIII. Patients through at any time received radiotherapy to the head and neck region will be excluded anyway IX. Uncontrolled bleeding disorders such as: hemophilia, thrombocytopenia, granulocytopenia X. Degenerative diseases XI. Osteoradionecrosis XII. Renal failure XIII. Organ transplant recipients XIV. HIV positive (self-declaration) XV. Malignant diseases XVI. Diseases that compromise the immune system XVII. Unbalanced diabetes. (HbA1c above 7.2 assessed by self-declaration) XVIII. Psychotic diseases XIX. Hypersensitivity or specific contraindications to one of the components of any of the products used in the study XX. Women who are pregnant (self-declaration); or lactating at the time of recruitment and of surgery XXI. Site where a history of failed periodontal regenerative procedure in the last two years XXII. Heavy Smokers (5 cigarettes and more per day) XXIII. other uncontrolled systemic diseases XXIV. disorders or treatments that compromise wound healing XXV. chronic high dose steroid therapy XXVI. bone metabolic diseases

Evaluation of the Safety, Feasibility, and Early Clinical Outcomes of Patient-Specific Bone Defect Implants Fabricated From Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) Using 3D Printing Technology

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of patient-specific bone defect implants fabricated from Ti-6Al-4V using 3D printing technology and to assess early clinical outcomes within the first 12 months following implantation of these customized devices. The main question it aims to answer is: "In patients with bone defects requiring surgical reconstruction, are patient-specific bone defect implants fabricated from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) using 3D printing technology - designed and produced at VinUni, safe and feasible for clinical use, and do they result in favorable early clinical outcomes within the first 12 months following implantation?"

Autologous Dentine Graft Compared to Xenograft in Managing Periodontally Compromised Second Molar After Third Molar Removal

The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of autologous dentin graft (ADG) in treating periodontal defects on the distal aspect of mandibular 2nd molar (M2) after surgical removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molar (M3) by improving periodontal and radiological outcomes when compared with a xenograft, which is commercially available. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How does the clinical efficacy of ADG compare to xenografts, regarding wound healing and periodontal parameters at the distal aspect of periodontally compromised mandibular M2 following impacted M3 extraction? 2. How does the radiological bone regeneration at ADG-grafted sites differ from that at xenograft-grafted sites? 3. How do the post-operative patient-reported outcomes at sites receiving ADG differ from those at sites receiving xenografts? Researchers will compare ADG to xenograft to see if ADG is more efficacious in managing periodontal defects on distal aspect of M2 after surgical removal of M3. Participants will 1. Undergo bilateral surgical removal of M3 under general anaesthesia 2. Receive ADG on test site and xenograft on contralateral control site 3. Come back for clinical assessments, wound healing assessments and radiographic assessments for 5 times after the surgery (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months)

Study on Safety and Performance of AdvanCore Bone Void Filler

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of AdvanCore implantable bone graft through a 12-month follow-up period in a prospective, parallel-group design, non-controlled, open label, multi-center and real-world setting study. This study is intended to satisfy post-market clinical follow-up requirements of CE Mark in Europe.

Cranioplasty Using Titanium Mesh vs Bone Cement

The aim of this study is: To compare the surgical outcomes between titanium mesh and bone cement in cranioplasty. To assess the complication rates associated with each material. To evaluate patient satisfaction and aesthetic results post-surgery

Multi-center Study on Comprehensive Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Limb Bone Defect Based on Three-dimensional Printing Technology

The clinical diagnosis and treatment of lower limb bone defect is a difficult problem in orthopedics. The traditional treatment has the shortcomings of long treatment period, no weight bearing in the early stage of the limb, weak mechanical strength, many complications, and difficulty in repairing deformed and large segment bone defects around the joint. The Orthopedics Department of Peking University Third Hospital, the lead unit of this study, developed the TCBridge system based on three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in the early stage, which is the first approved 3D printing lower limb long bone defect repair system in China. The system can achieve personalized and accurate repair of lower limb bone defects, and ensure patients to carry out limb weight and functional exercise safely in the early stage after surgery. On this basis, this study will establish a multi-center clinical case cohort to achieve accurate comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of lower limb bone defects, benefiting patients and contributing to society.