Clinical Research Directory

Comparative Effects of Dynamic Cupping and Facilitated Positional Release in Cervicogenic Headache

Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a secondary headache disorder originating from structural and functional impairments of the cervical spine, accounting for approximately 15-20% of all chronic headaches worldwide. It is characterized by unilateral head pain referred from the osseous, discal, or soft tissue elements of the upper cervical spine, frequently accompanied by restricted cervical range of motion, myofascial tenderness, significant neck disability, and disrupted sleep quality. Due to prolonged poor posture, repetitive neck movements, and increased sedentary lifestyles, the prevalence of cervicogenic headache has increased significantly in recent years. Although various physiotherapy interventions are available for its management, identifying the most effective conservative treatment approach remains a challenge due to the multifactorial nature and complexity of the condition, highlighting the need for further research. This study therefore aims to conduct the first randomized clinical trial directly comparing the effects of Dynamic Cupping and Facilitated Positional Release across five clinically relevant, multidimensional outcomes in patients with cervicogenic headache specifically pain intensity, headache impact, cervical range of motion, neck disability, and sleep quality. The study design will be a randomized clinical trial. Non-probability Consecutive sampling technique will be used, and participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. Evaluation will be done using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Universal Goniometer (UG), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Group A will receive Dynamic Cupping therapy, while Group B will receive Facilitated Positional Release technique. Both groups will receive three treatment sessions per week over four weeks, totaling 12 sessions, alongside a standardized baseline conventional therapy comprising hot pack application and cervical muscle stretches and Isometrics. Measurements of all outcome variables will be taken at baseline and after 4 weeks. The collected data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25.

Trigger Point Injection and Myofascial Release for Cervicogenic Headache

Cervicogenic headache is a type of headache associated with problems in the neck. This study aims to compare the effects of trigger point injection, myofascial release, and their combination in patients with cervicogenic headache. A total of 120 adults aged 18-65 years with cervicogenic headache are planned to be included and randomly assigned to one of four groups: trigger point injection with home exercises, myofascial release with home exercises, combined trigger point injection and myofascial release with home exercises, or home exercises alone. Trigger point injections will be performed using 0.5% lidocaine once weekly for four sessions. Myofascial release will also be provided once weekly for four sessions in the relevant groups. The home exercise program will include neck range-of-motion exercises, stretching, and is

The Role Of Fascia And Breathing Exercises In The Treatment Of Cervicogenic Headache

This study aims to investigate the effect of specific exercise programs on individuals suffering from cervicogenic headaches, a type of headache originating from neck problems. While traditional physiotherapy is the standard approach, this research examines whether the addition of specific "fascia-focused" exercises or "breathing exercises" provides improved relief. Fascia is a thin, protective membrane layer surrounding every muscle and organ in the body. In this study, participants will be divided into three groups. All participants will receive standard neck exercises and posture training. One group will perform dynamic exercises targeting the body's connective tissue (fascia) to improve flexibility and coordination. Another group will practice specific breathing techniques to help reduce muscle tension and stress-related triggers. The exercises will be administered to participants for 12 weeks. It is expected that fascia exercises and breathing exercises will have positive effects on headaches as a result of the applied treatments.

Effects of Strain Counterstrain Versus Post Isometric Relaxation on Pain, Headache Frequency, and Quality of Life in Females With Cervicogenic Headache.

Cervicogenic headache is a secondary headache disorder associated with dysfunction of the cervical spine and surrounding muscles. It may cause neck pain, muscle tenderness, recurrent headaches, and limitations in daily activities, ultimately affecting quality of life. The study aimed to determine whether Strain Counterstrain (SCS) or Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) produces better outcomes in reducing pain intensity, decreasing headache frequency, and improving headache-related quality of life. A randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Physiotherapy Department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, involving 34 female participants who were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 17 participants each. Group A received Strain Counterstrain, while Group B received Post-Isometric Relaxation. Strain Counterstrain is a passive manual therapy technique in which the therapist positions the affected cervical tissues in a comfortable position to reduce tenderness and abnormal muscle activity. Participants were assessed using three outcome measures: the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) to measure pain intensity, a Headache Frequency Diary to record headache episodes, and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) to assess the effect of headaches on daily functioning and quality of life. Assessments were conducted at baseline, after six weeks, and at twelve weeks, as reported in the results section. The study aimed to determine whether Strain Counterstrain (SCS) or Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) produces better outcomes in reducing pain intensity, decreasing headache frequency, and improving headache-related quality of life.

Clinical Study of Myofascial Trigger Points(MTrPs) Injection in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis(OA)

Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a common disease in China, with a high incidence among the elderly, and has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Knee osteoarthritis is a common type of CMP. Currently, both domestic and international studies have confirmed that glucocorticoid injection at myofascial trigger points(MTrPs) can alleviate patients' pain symptoms. MTrPs injection is safe and easy to operate, and can improve the clinical management efficiency of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized controlled, blinded outcome, non-inferiority study to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of glucocorticoid injection at myofascial trigger points and complex intra-articular injection in treating knee osteoarthritis. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups and receive either glucocorticoid injection at MTrPs or joint cavities. After treatment, patients will be followed up for 2 years. Their NRS scores, WOMAC scores, Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC) scale, and adverse reactions will be recorded at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. If the results indicate that the clinical efficacy of myofascial trigger point injection for knee osteoarthritis is not inferior to that of injection at intra-articular injection, it will provide a safe and simple treatment option that is easy to promote for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment.

Treating Chronic Cervicogenic Head and Neck Pain

The primary aim is to test the combined effectiveness of OMT and targeted head exercise (THE) to achieve a significant decrease in headache measures of frequency, intensity, and duration in a Treatment group when compared to a Control group whose members receive only standard medical care. A parallel, 2-arm, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will focus upon female patients (18 to 75 years of age) who have been diagnosed with chronic cervicogenic headache (CeH) based upon a differential diagnosis that includes classification according to the International Headache Society Classification IHSD 3rd Edition, reproduction of referred headache resulting from manual pressure over the upper cervical regions, and objective MRI findings. It is estimated that a sample size of 30 will provide sufficient statistical power (79%) to detect an intervention effect that corresponds to a clinically meaningful recovery (60%). CeH is classified as a secondary headache disorder because the headache pain is a consequence of injury to, or disease of, the bony and/or soft tissues of the upper cervical spine. It has been reported that some patients diagnosed with CeH demonstrate atrophy and/or fatty infiltration (FI) of the RCPm muscles on MRI. FI and/or a reduction in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of active muscle would not be expected to be the direct cause of chronic headache, but either or both could prevent muscles from generating normal physiologic levels of force. It has been shown that there is a functional connection between the pain sensitive dura mater and RCPm muscles and it is known that mechanical stretching of the dura mater results in referred headache. While FI and/or a reduction in the CSA of active muscle would not be expected to be the direct cause of chronic headache, it is known that muscle pathology will result in functional deficits. It is proposed that pathology in RCPm muscles will compromise the normal functional relationship between the RCPm and the dura mater and result in referred head and neck pain. It is predicted that at the end of the study, the Treatment group will show a significant decrease in headache measures that will be accompanied by a significant increase in CSA and a significant decrease in FI on MRI, and restoration of a normal head posture that will not be seen in the Control group. The proposed study is unique in that we are proposing both a mechanism and a source for some instances of CeH. By testing the effectiveness of specific interventions to address a specific pathology within a specific headache population, and by restricting the study cohort to female subjects presenting with CeH, this study will increase the ability to detect a significant change in the outcomes by increasing the power of the statistical analysis.

Comparative Effects of Post Isometric Relaxation and Reciprocal Inhibition in Individuals With Cervicogenic Headache.

This study aims to compare the effects of Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR) and Reciprocal Inhibition (RI) in individuals with cervicogenic headache, a secondary headache originating from dysfunction of the cervical spine, particularly the upper cervical segments. Cervicogenic headache is characterized by unilateral head and neck pain, restricted cervical mobility, muscle tightness, and functional limitations that negatively affect daily activities and quality of life. The study will employ a randomized controlled trial involving 46 participants aged 18-45 years who meet the inclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group A will receive Post Isometric Relaxation, while Group B will receive Reciprocal Inhibition. Both groups will also receive a standard physiotherapy protocol consisting of hot packs, cervical isometric exercises, and C1-C2 Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs), administered three times per week for four weeks. Pain intensity, functional disability, and cervical range of motion will be assessed before and after the intervention using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and goniometric measurements, respectively. By comparing these two muscle energy techniques, the study seeks to determine which intervention is more effective in reducing pain, improving cervical mobility, and enhancing functional outcomes, thereby providing evidence to support clinical decision-making and optimize physiotherapy management for individuals with cervicogenic headache.

Mulligan Technique Versus Proprioceptive Training in Cervicogenic Headache

This study will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of mulligan versus proprioceptive training on pain severity, headache disability, flexion rotation test, pain threshold, cervical joint position error in patients with cervicogenic headache.

"Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilization Techniques Versus Maitland Mobilization on Management of Cervicogenic Headache

EFFECTIVENESS OF KALTENBORN MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES VERSUS MAITLAND MOBILIZATION ON MANAGEMENT OF CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE

Comparative Effects Of Eye-Cervical Re-Education Exercises And Pressure Biofeedback Training Of Deep Cervical Flexors In Cervicogenic Headache

Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a secondary headache that originates from dysfunction in the upper cervical spine, particularly the atlanto-occipital and C1-C3 segments, and is perceived in one or more regions of the head and/or face. The underlying mechanism involves convergence of cervical and trigeminal afferents in the trigeminocervical nucleus. Structures innervated by the C1, C2, and C3 spinal nerves are capable of producing referred pain to the head. CGH is relatively common, accounting for approximately 15-20% of all chronic headaches. It typically worsens with neck movement and is often associated with limited cervical range of motion. One of the key impairments in individuals with CGH is disrupted cervical sensorimotor control, particularly affecting proprioception and deep cervical muscle coordination. Physical therapy is widely recognized as the first-line treatment for CGH, with emerging evidence supporting interventions aimed at improving cervical proprioception and neuromuscular control. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two sensorimotor-based physical therapy approaches-eye-cervical re-education and pressure biofeedback training of deep cervical flexors (DCF)-in patients with CGH. The primary outcomes include pain intensity, functional disability, cervical range of motion (ROM), and cervical joint position sense (proprioception). Participants will be recruited using purposive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and Foundation University College of Physical Therapy (FUCP), Islamabad. After providing written informed consent, eligible participants will be randomized into two groups. Group 1 will receive conventional physical therapy along with eye-cervical re-education exercises, while Group 2 will receive conventional therapy combined with pressure biofeedback DCF training. Data will be collected at baseline and after the 10th treatment session to assess within- and between-group changes in the outcome measures. This study aims to inform evidence-based physical therapy practice in the management of cervicogenic headache.

Baseline Cervical Joint Position Error and Headache Intensity

Cervicogenic headache is a type of headache associated with problems or dysfunction in the neck. People with cervicogenic headache may experience headache pain along with neck pain, reduced neck movement, and difficulties with normal neck function. Cervical joint position error (JPE) is a measure of how accurately a person can return their head to its starting position after moving the neck. A greater JPE may indicate reduced accuracy of neck position sense. The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine whether the amount of cervical JPE measured before physiotherapy is associated with headache intensity at the completion of physiotherapy in adults clinically classified with cervicogenic headache. The study will also examine whether baseline cervical JPE is associated with achieving a meaningful reduction in headache intensity. The study will use existing clinical records of adults aged 18 to 65 years who were clinically classified with cervicogenic headache and received routine physiotherapy at a university teaching hospital. Records from January 2023 to December 2025 will be reviewed. Participants must have had cervical JPE and headache intensity recorded before physiotherapy and must have completed at least four physiotherapy sessions with a treatment-completion assessment. Cervical JPE will be assessed from the recorded baseline measurements obtained using a CROM (Cervical Range of Motion) device. Headache intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. The primary outcome will be headache intensity recorded at the treatment-completion assessment. The study will compare baseline cervical JPE with treatment-completion headache intensity while taking into account other relevant factors, including baseline headache intensity, neck disability, age, and sex. The study will also examine whether participants achieved a reduction of at least 2 points on the NPRS during the observed treatment period. As this is a retrospective observational study, the researchers will not assign or change participants' treatment. The study will use information already available in clinical records and will not require participants to receive additional treatment or undergo additional assessments. The study is intended to determine whether baseline cervical JPE may be associated with subsequent headache outcomes and whether it may be useful as a potential prognostic factor. It will not determine whether cervical JPE causes headache or whether JPE should be used to select a particular physiotherapy treatment. The findings may help guide future research on factors that are associated with treatment outcomes in people with cervicogenic headache. Further prospective studies may be needed to determine whether cervical JPE has useful prognostic value at the individual patient level.

Osteopathic Care Combined With Physiotherapy and Pain Education for Cervicogenic Headache

Introduction: Cervicogenic headache (CH) is a secondary headache associated with non-traumatic dysfunctions of the cervical region. Osteopathic Care (OC) has shown promising results in reducing pain and disability in patients with migraine, tension-type headaches and CH, but the effectiveness of OC remains scarce, and the studies has low certainty of evidence. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the OC in the management of headache-related disability in patients with CH 6 weeks and 24 weeks after the intervention compared with sham and control group. Methods: This is a three-arm, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 adult participants with chronic CH will be recruited. Participants must report episodic headache for at least 3 months, occurring at least once per week, present cervical mobility less than 44° on the cervical flexion-rotation test, and exhibit headache during provocative tests at C0, C1, C2, and/or C3. After randomization, the experimental group will receive OC plus Physiotherapy (specific exercises for the cervical spine and Mulligan´s manual therapy) and a pain education booklet. The control group will receive the same Physiotherapy and pain education intervention. The sham group will receive the OC sham combined with Physiotherapy and pain education. Primary outcome will be headache-related disability, assessed by Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity (VAS) and the Perceived Changes Questionnaire (PCQ). Outcome assessment will be carried out at baseline, 6 weeks after the intervention and 24 weeks follow up with an intention-to-treat framework. Expected Results: OC combined with Physiotherapy and pain education would be effectiveness in reducing headache-related disability compared to the sham and control groups, 6 weeks after the intervention.

Relationship Between Upper Cervical Mobility and Temporomandibular Joint Range of Motion in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders

Upper cervical spine mobility plays a crucial role in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function. This observational study investigates the relationship between upper cervical spine mobility and TMJ range of motion in patients diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Cervical hypomobility may restrict mandibular movement and contribute to TMJ dysfunction through shared biomechanical and neuromuscular mechanisms.

Manual Therapy vs. Multicomponent Exercise in Cervicogenic Headache

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of manual therapy and a multicomponent exercise program on suboccipital muscle thickness, joint position sense, pain, central sensitization, balance, and kinesiophobia in patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache. Cervicogenic headache is a common secondary headache originating from dysfunction in the upper cervical spine. Dysfunction in the deep neck muscles, impaired neck joint awareness, and heightened pain sensitivity (central sensitization) are frequently observed in these patients. While both manual therapy and targeted exercise are used in physiotherapy practice, evidence regarding their direct comparative effects on suboccipital muscle morphology and somatosensory parameters remains limited. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for a duration of 4 weeks (12 sessions total): 1. Manual Therapy Group: Receives joint mobilization, myofascial release, trigger point release, and suboccipital distraction targeting the cervical region. 2. Multicomponent Exercise Group: Receives deep cervical flexor strengthening, cervical proprioception training, head-eye coordination training, and progressive balance exercises. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Do manual therapy and multicomponent exercise improve suboccipital muscle thickness and cervical joint position sense in patients with cervicogenic headache? * Is there a significant difference between manual therapy and multicomponent exercise in reducing pain intensity, central sensitization, disability, and fear of movement (kinesiophobia)? It is hypothesized that both intervention protocols will yield significant clinical improvements, with specific synergistic adaptations in muscle structure, somatosensory system processing, and pain-related fear.

Physical Profile of Cervicogenic Headache: Comparison With Neck Pain and Healthy Controls

The goal of this observational study is to compare physical findings across three adult groups. Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a headache linked to a problem in the neck. Neck pain may affect posture, muscle function, grip strength, and sensitivity to pressure. Researchers do not know whether CGH has a distinct pattern of these findings. The main questions are: * Do posture, grip strength, muscle stiffness, elasticity, and pressure sensitivity differ among the groups? * Are any differences more closely associated with CGH than with neck pain? Researchers will compare adults ages 25 through 60. One group will include people with CGH lasting at least three months. Another group will include people with neck pain lasting at least six months. People in the neck pain group will have no headaches. Healthy participants will have no neck pain or headaches. Researchers will not provide treatment or change participants' usual care. Each participant will complete one study visit lasting about 15 minutes. Participants will: * Answer short questions about their health and pain * Stand while researchers measure their head and neck posture * Squeeze a device that measures grip strength * Complete brief tests of neck muscle stiffness and elasticity * Tell researchers when applied pressure first becomes painful Researchers will compare results across the three groups. The findings may guide future CGH assessment and treatment research.

Effect of Isometric Neck Exercises on Cervicogenic Headache Symptoms, Cortisol and BDNF Levels Among Smart Phone Users

Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a secondary headache type caused due to refereed pain arising from the cervical spine in the forehead, sometimes in temporal region. Which may have great impact on our daily life activities; decreased range of motion at cervical spine, decreased sleep quality, increased stress, disturbed mood and altered physiologic chemicals. It is found to be more prevalent in females and is experimentally diagnosed by the Cervical Flexion-Rotation Test (CFRT) which is performed by a therapist. Also, the upper trapezius midpoint (2 cm lateral to C2) mostly acts as a pressure point. Other pressure points in cervical region may also develop. The pain is mostly on one side and remains on one side. It can be dull aching or pressure like pain. No photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or tearing of eyes is associated with it. In the modern age, smartphone addiction (SPA) contributes significantly to CGH by promoting forward head posture, rounded shoulders, and impaired proprioception. (4)Despite this, there is a clear gap in the literature regarding body awareness, ergonomics, and targeted prevention strategies for smartphone-related postural problems. There is an urgent need for structured training programs and therapeutic interventions to address these concerns, combined with long-term follow-up studies. In this study, investigators focus on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a key biomarker of pain sensitization. Chronic stress and pain reduce neuronal BDNF uptake, decreasing the serum BDNF levels, while effective interventions are expected to elevate BDNF levels, improving motor performance and reducing nociceptive signaling. Literature shows that there is a significant increase in BDNF levels in moderate intensity aerobic exercise groups as compared to the control group. This study aims to improve BDNF levels through isometric targeted exercise and ultimately improve the synaptic plasticity, mitochondrial activity, increased beta-endorphins. An increase in body temperature through exercise will also reduce pain sensitization and improve function. In this study, we also target stress levels by focusing on cortisol as a biomarker. As the physiological and psychological stress is increased due to prolonged flexion and increased screen tim,e sleep quality is also disturbed. We aim to evaluate whether targeted isometric neck exercises can enhance BDNF levels, regulate cortisol as a stress marker, and ultimately improve CGH symptoms. As we know that high stress elevates cortisol and disrupts the HPA axis, This study was having hypothesis that exercise-induced adaptations will downregulate the HPA axis, decrease cortisol, restore neuronal health, and enhance cognitive and motor functions and we also address how poor sleep, exacerbated by excessive screen time, contributes to cognitive, memory, and metabolic issues. By investigating the effects of exercise on sleep quality, our study fills a crucial research gap linking SPA, stress, BDNF, cortisol, and CGH offering a novel therapeutic approach that combines patient education, circadian rhythm alignment, and structured isometric exercise to improve health outcomes in adolescents.

CORRELATION BETWEEN FORWARD HEAD POSTURE, CERVICAL MUSCLES ENDURANCE, AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE FUCTIONS IN CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE AMONG LATE ADOLESCENT STUDENTS.

Forward Head Posture (FHP) is a common postural deviation characterized by anterior translation of the head relative to the trunk, which increases load on cervical muscles and joints. This postural change is associated with muscle fatigue, joint compression, and tension in cervical soft tissues, contributing to cervicogenic headache (Al-Mutairi et al., 20242; Koseoglu et al., 2023). The deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles, especially the longus colli and longus capitis, are key stabilizers of the cervical spine, and weakness or fatigue of these muscles leads to overuse of superficial muscles such as the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene, creating an imbalance between deep and superficial systems. Diminished endurance of deep cervical flexors has been linked to forward head posture, impaired motor control, and persistent neck pain (Ismail et al., 2023). Cervical proprioception is crucial for accurate head position sense. Impaired cervical proprioception results in distorted information about head orientation, causing dizziness, incoordinated movement, and neck discomfort, and has been frequently observed in juniors with cervicogenic headache, increasing muscular strain and headache intensity. In the present study, therefore, we aim to investigate the correlation between FHP, cervical endurance, and proprioceptive function in junior students with cervicogenic headache

Comparison of Myofascial Release and Mulligan Concept Techniques in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache

The International Headache Society classifies cervicogenic headache as a secondary headache caused by a disorder of the cervical spine and its components. Mulligan Concept (SNAG) is a gentle manual therapy that can be applied to the neck area. The myofascial release technique is also a massage-type manual therapy technique that is widely used in physiotherapy to relieve pain and tension in the relevant muscle group. This clinical trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Mulligan Concept and myofascial release technique in patients with cervicogenic headaches. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the Mulligan Concept improve hand grip strength, pressure pain threshold, range of motion, pain frequency, pain intensity, pain duration, number of medications used, daily living activities, and disability in patients with cervicogenic headache? 2. Does myofascial release technique improve hand grip strength, pressure pain threshold, range of motion, pain frequency, pain intensity, pain duration, number of medications used, daily living activities, and disability in patients with cervicogenic headache? Researchers will compare the Mulligan Concept to a myofascial release technique to see which physiotherapy method has more significant results in treating cervicogenic headaches. Participants will: * Undergo the evaluations mentioned above before and after interventions * Undergo Mulligan Concept applications or the myofascial release technique 3 times a week for 4 weeks * Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use a drug

Effects of Graston Versus Myofascial Release Technique in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache

Cervicogenic Headache (CGH) is a painful condition that has pronounced impacts on quality and activity of daily lives. It is often associated with decreased mobility, muscular tightness, and postural deviations. When neck muscles become tight, weak, or irritated, they change the way the neck moves and put pressure on nearby joints and nerves. This pressure delivers pain signals to the head, causing a Cervicogenic headache.

Suboccipital Muscle Inhibition Technique vs Rocabado Exercises on Cervicogenic Headache

The purpose of the study is to explore the effectiveness of Suboccipital muscle inhibition technique vs Rocabado exercises on cervicogenic headache. A randomized control trial was conducted at National Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Alees Medical Centre Islamabad. The sample size was 40 calculated through G-power 3.1. The participants were divided into two interventional groups each having 20 participants. The study duration was six months. Sampling technique applied was non-probability purposive sampling for recruitment and group randomization using flip coin method. Only 20 to 50 years participants with chronic cervicogenic headache were included in the study. Tools used in this study are Digital Inclinometer, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Romberg Test and HIT-6 Questionnaire. Data was collected at baseline, and at the end of 2nd week. Data analyzed through SPSS version 27.

The Classification and Treatment of Myofascial Headache: a Cross-sectional Study and Randomized Controlled Trial.

This project comprises two studies; a cross-sectional study and a randomized controlled trial. 1. The goal of the cross-sectional study is to compare multiple outcome parameters in different headache types: tension type (TTH), cervicogenic (CGH) and myofascial headache (MFH) as drafted by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). Not only will these types be compared against each other, they will also be compared to healthy controls (HC). The main research questions are: * Are the criteria drafted by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) discriminative for MFH? * Are there differences between the headache types (and healthy controls) in pain \& disability scores, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, muscle elasticity and hyperalgesia (=pain pressure threshold, PPT)? Participants will : * Fill out questionnaires about their pain and disability; * Be clinically investigated by a physiotherapist (anamnesis, inspection, examination of movement and structures of the neck and head); * Undergo a testing battery including neck ROM, neck muscle strength \& elasticity and PPT measurement of the C2 processus spinosus, the bilateral upper trapezius muscle and the tibialis anterior muscle of the dominant leg. 2. The goal of this randomized controlled study is to investigate the additional effect of dry needling in the treatment of MFH patients, as compared to a treatment consisting of manual techniques only. The main question it aims to answer is: * Does manual therapy combined with dry needling provide an additional effect on pain, disability and functional outcomes in MFH patients, as compared to manual therapy alone? After the baseline test (see part 1), participants with MFH will be randomly divided to receive 4 sessions over 4 weeks of MT or MT + DN. Hereafter, the baseline test is repeated at 1 week and 3 months post-treatment.

Comparative Effects of Back School Based Intervention Versus Cranio-Cervical Muscle Training in Computer Users With Cervicogenic Headache

The aim of the study is to compare Back School Based Intervention with Cranio- Cervical muscle training in participants with Cervicogenic headache. The study wants to investigate that which intervention helps to mange pain, improve posture and reduce disability. The study aims to answer the question: * How effective is Back School Based intervention on pain, posture and disability in computer users with Cervicogenic headache compared to Cranio-cervical Muscle Training? Participants will * Attend the treatment sessions of the group in which they are placed. * Take treatment session two times a week for eight weeks. * Participants will be asked about their pain and activities throughout the study.

The MONARCH Case Series Study: SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Head Pain

The purpose of this study is to learn if pain can be relieved by delivering small amounts of electricity (called "electrical stimulation") to the nerves at the top of the neck. This study will use a device called the SPRINT® PNS System. PNS stands for peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). This device is cleared by the FDA for up to 60 days of use for relief of chronic or acute pain.

PPIVMs for Cervicogenic Headache

Cervicogenic headache is a type of headache that originates from problems in the neck, particularly the upper cervical spine. It may cause headache pain, neck pain, reduced neck movement, disability, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life. Physiotherapy management commonly includes therapeutic exercise and manual therapy techniques. This randomized clinical trial examined whether adding Passive Physiological Intervertebral Movements to a structured therapeutic exercise program was more effective than therapeutic exercise alone in patients with cervicogenic headache. Participants diagnosed with cervicogenic headache were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group received Passive Physiological Intervertebral Movements targeting the upper cervical joints, in addition to therapeutic exercises. The control group received the same therapeutic exercise program without Passive Physiological Intervertebral Movements. Both groups received eight supervised treatment sessions over four weeks, with each session lasting approximately 15 to 20 minutes. The exercise program included cervical flexion exercises, scapular retraction, stretching exercises, and active neck mobility exercises. Participants were also encouraged to perform the exercises at home. The study was conducted between May 2022 and August 2025 at the outpatient physiotherapy departments of Jordan University of Science and Technology and King Abdullah University Hospital. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately after the four-week intervention, and at three-month follow-up. The outcomes included headache pain intensity, headache frequency, neck pain intensity, neck disability, depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life. These were measured using validated tools, including the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, and Short Form-12 quality of life questionnaire. The study aimed to determine whether adding Passive Physiological Intervertebral Movements to exercise provides additional benefits for patients with cervicogenic headache compared with exercise alone. The trial included 64 participants.