Clinical Research Directory

Personalized Medicine Decision-Making in a Virtual Clinical Setting

Background: -How people respond to drugs depends in part on their genes. For some drugs, doctors can use an individuals genetic background to help in dosing the drug. Researchers want to know how doctors incorporate personalized or genomic medicine into clinical practice. Objective: -To study how physicians make personalized treatment decisions Eligibility: -Healthy adult primary care physicians who are internal (or family) medicine residents. Design: * Participants will complete a screening form. * Participants will put on a headset, called a head-mounted display, showing a virtual reality environment. * The environment will contain an exam room and the virtual patient. * After interacting with the virtual patient, participants will complete a series of survey measures. * Participation will last for about 60 minutes. The virtual patient interaction and follow-up questions will be audio taped.

ClotTriever® Thrombectomy System Use-Result Survey in Japan

The objective of this survey is to determine the safety and efficacy of the ClotTriever Thrombectomy System under daily clinical practice after marketing approval in Japan. This device was designated as a subject of use results evaluation at the time of application for manufacturing and marketing approval.

SAFELY RULING OUT DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN PREGNANCY WITH THE LEFt SCORE AND TRIMESTER-ADJUSTED D-DIMER CUTOFFS (the PREG-DVT Study): A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in high-income countries.1 DVT is suspected in pregnancy greater than 10 times more often than it is confirmed.2 The overlap between physiological symptoms of pregnancy (e.g. leg edema and calf, thigh and groin discomfort) and those of DVT often leads to referral for investigation of DVT, especially in later stages of pregnancy. DVT during pregnancy has a strong left leg predominance likely due to left iliac vein compression by the right iliac artery and the gravid uterus.3,4 Unfortunately, the only validated strategies to exclude DVT in pregnant patients require diagnostic imaging as the first step in the diagnostic algorithm. Specifically, compression ultrasonography (CUS), either as a single, whole-leg ultrasound2,5 or as a serial proximal ultrasound6 has been validated to exclude DVT during pregnancy. The LEFt clinical decision score-a simple three-item tool including Left leg symptoms, Edema (≥2 cm calf circumference difference compared to the other leg), and First trimester onset of symptoms-has shown promise in the LEFt derivation study6 and retrospective validation studies.7,8 More recently, the score was tested in a prospective study (LEAD study, OC, ISTH Congress, Paris 2026; submitted for publication), which confirmed its safety in association with D-dimers at the usual cutoff of 500 ng/ml to safely rule out DVT in pregnant patients. However, the diagnostic was quite low as only 7.4% of included patients could have DVT excluded based on this association. When exploring D-dimer at trimester adjusted thresholds of \<500 ng/ml FEUs (1st trimester), \<750 ng/ml FEUs (2nd trimester) and \<1000 ng/ml FEUs (3rd trimester), D-dimer was negative in 142/352 (40.3%) and yielded negative predictive values of 142/142, 100% (95% CI 97.4%-100%). Therefore, we plan a multinational management diagnostic outcome study in pregnant patients with suspected DVT by using 1) an assessment of clinical probability by the LEFt score, 2) trimester-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs, 4) compression ultrasonography.

PROfunda Femoris Vein Thrombosis Evaluation and Clearance to Improve Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis are prone to developing post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The profunda femoris vein (PFV) is an important inflow of the iliofemoral vein. Profunda femoris vein thrombosis clearance (PFV-TC) may improve the patency of iliofemoral vein and reduce the occurrence of PTS.

Evaluating the Use of Grip Exercises to Decrease Deep Vein Thrombosis in Adult Patients With PICC Lines

Patients who have a peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) placed are at a risk of developing a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At TriHealth, approximately 2-4 patients per month who have a PICC placed experience a subsequent DVT. One innovative way to possibly mitigate the risk of DVTs is hand grip exercises. The current study will be the first study to evaluate hand grip exercises for the prevention of DVTs in adult patients hospitalized in the United States.

TRiP-cast Score Validation and Evaluation of Adherence to Preventive Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients With Lower Limb Trauma Requiring Immobilization

This is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study designed to externally validate the Trauma-Related Immobilization-related Prophylaxis (TRiP(cast)) score in Tunisian adults with acute lower-limb trauma requiring immobilization and managed as outpatients. The study will assess the ability of the TRiP(cast) score to identify patients at increased risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A secondary objective is to evaluate adherence to prescribed thromboprophylaxis and to compare adherence between patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and those receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Factors associated with treatment adherence, bleeding events, and thromboembolic outcomes will also be investigated. Patients aged 18 years or older with acute lower-limb trauma requiring immobilization for at least 7 days will be enrolled consecutively and followed prospectively. The decision to prescribe thromboprophylaxis and the choice of anticoagulant will remain entirely at the discretion of the treating physician according to routine clinical practice. Study investigators will not influence treatment decisions. The results are expected to provide external validation of the TRiP(cast) score in the Tunisian population and improve risk stratification and thromboprophylaxis management in ambulatory patients with lower-limb trauma.

Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgeries; Using Propensity Score Matching

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common post-operative complication. The necessity for anticoagulant therapy after orthopedic surgeries is widely understood, but treatment administration patterns in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgeries during the hospital stay have yet to be examined. The main objective of this study is to perform a comparative effectiveness review examining the benefits and harms associated with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. It is around efficacy and safety evaluation of using anticoagulant for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries taking into the account the reliable selection of patients most benefit. The aims of this study is to analyze patient records in teaching hospitals database of our country (including: Hanoi Medical University, Bach Mai Hospital, Cho Ray Hospital, Viet Duc University Hospital) and compare the outcomes and costs between different types of anticoagulant medications that were prescribed for the prevention of VTE following orthopedic surgeries. This analysis will assess and quantify the outcomes, resource utilization, and cost of care for patients receiving rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The outcomes of interest include the occurence of DVT and PE, rates of major bleeds, medical resource utilization, and total costs (medical plus pharmacy).

Intervention to Improve Utilization of Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Cancer Surgery

While blood clots after major cancer surgery are common and harmful to patients, the medications to decrease blood clot risk are seldom used after patients leave the hospital despite the recommendation of multiple professional medical societies. The reason why these medications are seldom prescribed is not well understood. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Does surgeon education paired with an electronic medical record based decision support tool improve the guideline concordant prescription of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism after abdominopelvic cancer surgery? * Does dedicated patient education regarding blood clots at the time of hospital discharge after abdominopelvic cancer surgery improve understanding of the risk of venous thromboembolism and adherence to pharmacologic prophylaxis? The investigators will study these questions using a stepped-wedge randomized trial where groups of surgeons will use a tool integrated to the electronic medical record to educate them on the individualized patient risks of blood clots after major cancer surgery and inform them regarding guidelines for preventative medicines. Utilization of the medications before and after using the tool will be compared. Patients will be administered a questionnaire assessing their awareness of blood clots as a risk after cancer surgery. For those prescribed medications to reduce blood clot risk after leaving the hospital, the questionnaire will evaluate whether they took the medications as prescribed. Survey results will be evaluated before and after implementation of education on blood clot risk at the time of hospital discharge.

BOLT-DVT: Study of the Indigo® Aspiration System When Used in Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Indigo Aspiration system for percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in a population presenting with obstruction due to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who are eligible for treatment.

inDividual, Targeted thrombosIS Prophylaxis Versus the Standard 'One Size Fits All' Approach in Patients Undergoing Total hIp or Total kNee replaCemenT

After hip or knee replacement all patients receive a standardized treatment with blood thinners, this medication is called thrombosis prophylaxis. However, despite this standard treatment some individuals still develop venous thrombosis (VTE), while others experience bleeding. This indicates that not all patients have the same VTE risk following surgery. Individualizing the amount of thrombosis prophylaxis following surgery might lead to less thrombotic and bleeding events. In this study the investigators individualize the treatment with thrombosis prophylaxis based on the medical history of a patient. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Can thrombosis prophylaxis be shortened in patients with a low VTE risk to decrease the risk of bleeding without increasing the risk of VTE? Does an increase in the dose and duration of thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with a high VTE risk reduce the risk of VTE without inducing an unacceptable risk of bleeds? Researchers will compare both the shortened treatment in low VTE risk patients and the intensified and extended treatment in high VTE risk patients with the standard treatment to assess the risk of VTE and bleeding in comparison to the standard treatment. Participants will receive 4 questionnaires to evaluate whether they have experienced a VTE or bleed. For this study no additional hospital visits are necessary.

Compression Ultrasonography in Non-high Probability of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Compression ultrasound is commonly used in emergency department. Accuracy to rule out deep vein thrombosis is excellent but lower then Ddimer assessment which is actually gold standard. With progress in formation of emergency physicians (EP), quality of material used, the investigators hypothesize that compression ultrasound can rule out deep vein thrombosis in case of non high probability, as standard care and DDimer assay.

Determining the Validity of ThinkSono Guidance for Ultrasound Image Acquisition and Remote Detection

The purpose of this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of ThinkSono Guidance, a software data collection and communication tool designed to collect ultrasound data to help detect blood clots in veins. The ThinkSono system is CE Mark approved in the European Union and in clinical use in Europe. Usually, when an ultrasound is conducted to detect blood clots in veins, a sonographer (trained technologist who conducts ultrasounds) and/or radiologist will conduct the procedure, including a compression ultrasound exam, and the scan may require a bulky cart and ultrasound equipment. ThinkSono Guidance is a mobile software application that enables other healthcare professionals such as nurses, non-radiologist physicians including general practitioners, and other allied healthcare professionals to perform the ultrasound at the point of care using guidance from the software app. This is a multi-site non-randomized, double-blinded, prospective cohort pivotal study.

The Effect of a VTE Prevention Care Bundle in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), remains a critical and potentially life-threatening complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite standard prophylactic measures, the incidence of VTE can be significant, highlighting the need for comprehensive and structured nursing interventions. A "care bundle" approach-a targeted set of evidence-based practices performed collectively and reliably-has been shown to improve patient outcomes and minimize complications in various clinical settings. This non-randomized controlled clinical trial aims to investigate the effect of a specifically designed VTE Prevention Care Bundle on clinical outcomes in patients recovering from total hip arthroplasty. The central hypothesis is that the systematic implementation of this care bundle will result in optimized clinical parameters, enhanced recovery experiences, and minimized VTE risks compared to standard routine care. Study Design and Population: The study utilizes a quasi-experimental, non-randomized controlled design. Participants are adult patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty. The Autar DVT Risk Assessment Scale is utilized strictly as an objective filtering tool during the patient selection process (inclusion criteria). Participants are systematically assigned to either a control group or an intervention group based on the study protocol phases. Interventions: Control Group: Patients receive the standard, routine orthopedic nursing care provided by the hospital, alongside the standard medical prophylaxis prescribed by their attending physicians. Intervention Group: Patients receive the specialized VTE Prevention Care Bundle. This comprehensive bundle consists of five core components: Education: Providing verbal and written information to the patient during the preoperative period. Early Mobilization: Ensuring controlled ambulation and mobilization in the early postoperative period. Exercise: Instructing and monitoring in-bed ankle-pumping exercises. Fluid Management: Encouraging adequate hydration and closely monitoring fluid intake. Mechanical Prophylaxis: Ensuring the correct application and continuous monitoring of elastic compression stockings. Data Collection and Follow-up Tools: Data is collected systematically during the inpatient stay and throughout a 90-day post-discharge period using the following tools: Descriptive Data Form: Records demographic and clinical characteristics (age, BMI, surgical history). Clinical Follow-up Chart: A researcher-developed form tracking leg circumference, Homan's sign, edema, erythema, vital signs, and International Normalized Ratio (INR) levels. Comfort Scale After Hip Prosthesis: A 26-item scale used to evaluate the patient's postoperative comfort. Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Care Scale: A 19-item scale evaluating patient satisfaction with the nursing care received. Likert-Type Fear of Falling Scale: Assesses patients' fear levels during mobilization. Post-Discharge 90-Day Follow-up Chart: A researcher-developed form utilized to monitor any hospital admissions or readmissions due to suspected VTE symptoms (leg swelling, pain, shortness of breath) during the 3-month follow-up period. Funding Status: A grant application for this research project has been submitted to The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK) and is currently under evaluation.

Emulation of the RECORD3 Trial Using Healthcare Claims Data

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real-world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real-world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Timing of Thromboprophylaxis After Postpartum Hemorrhage

Postpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Women who experience severe postpartum hemorrhage are at increased risk of both recurrent bleeding and venous thromboembolism. The optimal timing for starting pharmacological thromboprophylaxis after postpartum hemorrhage remains uncertain. This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Center of Maternity and Neonatology of Tunis, Tunisia. The study included women who experienced postpartum hemorrhage between 2018 and 2024 and received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during the postpartum period. The objective was to evaluate the association between the timing of thromboprophylaxis initiation and the occurrence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. The findings are expected to contribute to the optimization of thromboprophylaxis timing after postpartum hemorrhage and to improve the balance between the prevention of venous thromboembolism and the risk of recurrent bleeding.

Ancillary Study of the ULTREC Project

The ULTREC research project is designed to assess the safety of a negative strategy relying on Colour Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS) for excluding the diagnosis of a new thrombosis. The ULTREC project does not take into account the validity of the CDUS positive criteria used to confirm the diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) recurrence. The risk of considering only the negative strategy is to ignore the possibility of having an improvement in sensitivity and negative predictive value at the expense of specificity and positive predictive value and therefore to increase the false positive rate leading to an overdiagnosis of recurrence and an overtreatment, and a potential bleeding risk. In the ULTREC-ANCILLARY study, the research will aim at assessing the validity of baseline CDUS positive criteria for the diagnosis of DVT recurrence. As there is no diagnostic standard to which the results could be compared, it is suggested to validate these criteria based on the evolution of the thrombosis on CDUS performed at D90±5. The hypothesis is that an unchanged appearance under anticoagulation would be in favor of sequelae and will invalidate the initial diagnosis (diagnostic failure)

Diagnosis Exclusion of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Limbs

The purpose is to assess the safety of a management strategy based on colour doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and D-Dimer test results for the diagnosis exclusion of recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs. DVT recurrence requires using anticoagulant treatment to prevent thrombosis progression. Given an increased bleeding risk with prolonged treatment, an accurate diagnosis for recurrence is needed. However, the diagnosis of a new thrombosis in a previously involved leg is difficult. Imaging modalities and criteria that are currently used for the diagnosis may be equivocal and unable to discriminate between an old clot and a new one recently developed at the same site. An increase in vein diameter after vein compression by the ultrasound probe was suggested as a diagnostic criterion for a new DVT. This method has many limitations in clinical practice, mainly a lack of availability of a previous measurement and a poor inter-observer agreement. Colour Doppler ultrasound enables to study both the thrombus and the blood flow characteristics that might help to overcome these limitations. CDUS is a well-known method for the diagnosis of vascular diseases and is used in every day clinical practice for the diagnosis of a first DVT and DVT recurrence but CDUS has never been assessed for DVT recurrence in a study. The diagnosis of DVT recurrence may be easily established using the same criteria as for a first DVT episode. Our hypothesis is that CDUS associated with D-Dimer can safely rule out the diagnosis of DVT recurrence while maintaining a good specificity. The strategy consists in performing first a CDUS that helps to classify patients as having (positive CDUS) or not having (negative CDUS) a new thrombosis. In the case of an equivocal CDUS, a D-Dimer test is performed. If the D-dimer is normal, the diagnosis of DVT recurrence is ruled out and the patient is not treated. If the D-dimer is abnormal, the diagnosis cannot be excluded nor confirmed and a second CDUS is performed on D7±2. Meanwhile, patients are not treated by anticoagulants. An unchanged CDUS on D7±2 qualifies patients as free from a new DVT and they are not treated. Conversely a change in CDUS qualifies patients as having a new DVT which requires anticoagulant treatment. All patients have a 3-month follow-up for the assessment of potential venous thromboembolic events.

RIVAroxaban Versus Low-molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Lower Limb Trauma Requiring Brace or CASTing

Lower limb trauma requiring immobilization is a very frequent condition that is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The TRiP(cast) score has been developed to provide individual VTE risk stratification and help in thromboprophylactic anticoagulation decision. The recent CASTING study had confirmed that patients with a TRiP(cast) score \<7 have a very low risk of VTE and could be safely manage without prophylactic treatment. Conversely, patients with a score ≥ 7 have a high-risk of VTE and require a prophylactic anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective in this indication. However, in the CASTING study, the 3-month symptomatic VTE rate was 2.6% in this subgroup despite LMWH prophylactic treatment. This result suggests that LMWH are not sufficiently effective in this particular subgroup of high-risk patients. Direct oral anticoagulants, and in particular rivaroxaban, may be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH. In the PRONOMOS study, comparing LMWH with rivaroxaban in patients who had undergone non-major lower limb surgery, the relative risk of symptomatic VTE was 0.25 (95% CI = 0.09 - 0.75) in favor of rivaroxaban 10mg. No significant increase in bleeding was found. In addition, as LMWH treatment requires subcutaneous daily injections, the use of rivaroxaban may positively impact patients' quality of life as well as being effective in medico-economic terms. The aims of this study are to demonstrate that rivaroxaban is at least as effective, easier to use and more efficient than LMWH in patients with trauma to the lower limb requiring immobilisation and deemed to be at risk of venous thromboembolism (TRiP(cast) score ≥ 7). High-risk patients are randomized to receive either rivaroxaban or LMWH. They are followed up at 45 days and 90 days to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events or bleeding, as well as their satisfaction with the treatment received.

Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy of INR Measurements in a Point of Care Device

Comparison of capillary whole blood INR determined by LumiraDx Instrument to venous plasma INR determined by laboratory reference method (IL ACL ELITE PRO) for method comparison and assessment of accuracy and bias by regression analysis and other analytical methods.

A Performance Evaluation of the LumiraDx Point Of Care D-dimer Assay

In patients with symptoms of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (mainly deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)), the study will evaluate the agreement between the D-Dimer measurements from the LumiraDx POC D-Dimer assay and a reference method, as an aid in diagnosis, assessment and exclusion of DVT and PE.

Comparison Of Different Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis

A head-to-head comparison of two different types of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) - ClotTriever System versus aspiration thrombectomy (including rheolytic thrombectomy) - in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was conducted to determine whether ClotTriever System can improve thrombus clearance rate, reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and enhance the long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT.

Post-Market Celect Platinum Vena Cava Filter and Gunther Tulip Retrieval Set Study

This prospective, observational, post-market study will be performed to collect patient-level data on the Celect Platinum Vena Cava Filter Sets and the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Set to confirm continued safety and performance of the devices throughout their expected lifetime and continued acceptability of the benefit:risk ratio. Additionally, the study intends to evaluate longer-term (i.e., up to 5 years) outcome data while the filter is indwelling.

Apixaban in Thrombocytopenia

This study is being done to determine the feasibility and safety of using a novel dose adjusted apixaban for the management of participants with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (blood clot) or and thrombocytopenia (low number of platelets in the blood). Investigators are also looking to see if participants on this treatment have fewer bleeding episodes. The name of the study drug involved in this study is: -Apixiban (a type of anticoagulant)

Timing of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

The objective of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficiency of different anticoagulation schemes with heparin for venous thromboembolism prevention in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the optimal time for the beginning of anticoagulation with heparin to efficiently prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage? Early beginning (within the first 2 days but not earlier than 12 hours after the admission of a patient) or delayed beginning (on the third day after the admission of a patient)? * Which of the two timeframes (early or delayed) for anticoagulation beginning is the most safe in terms of bleeding complications including intracerebral hemorrhage expansion? Researchers will compare the results of early and delayed start of anticoagulation using heparin in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage to define the optimal start time for anticoagulation that provides the most favourable efficiency/safety profile. Participants will: * Undergo a computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain on hospital admission and then 12-24 hours after the hospital admission and 24 hours after the beginning of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis using heparin; * Undergo the ultrasound examination of lower extremity deep veins on hospital admission and then once every 7 days; * Receive prophylactic doses of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin either beginning within the first 2 days but not earlier than 12 hours after the hospital admission or starting on the 3rd day after the hospital admission.