Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 Dental Implant Rehabilitation clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07763431
Home-Use Dual-Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis in Full-Arch Implant Prostheses
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a home-use light device helps control gum inflammation around dental implants in adults who have a full set of fixed teeth attached to implants. This gum inflammation, called peri-implant mucositis, is common and reversible, but can lead to more serious problems if it is not controlled. The device is meant to be added to the usual professional cleaning and hygiene care, not to replace it. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does adding the home-use light device reduce gum bleeding around the implants more than the usual care alone? * Does it reduce the depth of the space around the implants and the amount of harmful bacteria? Researchers will compare adults who receive the usual professional care plus the home-use light device with adults who receive the usual professional care alone, to see if the device improves gum health. Participants will: * Receive professional cleaning and personalized instructions on how to keep their implant teeth clean at the start of the study. * Be placed by chance into one of two groups: usual care plus the home-use light device, or usual care alone. * Use the light device at home each day for 4 weeks (if in the device group) * Visit the clinic at the start, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks for gum checkups and to have bacteria samples taken.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-10-29
1 state
NCT07605286
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants
The goal of this study is to determine which method better increases the volume of soft tissues (gums) around dental implants: using the patient's own tissues or applying collagen matrices. The study also evaluates the safety of these methods and their impact on smile aesthetics. The main questions it aims to answer: Which method provides greater and more stable increase in gum thickness around the implant? Does the choice of material affect gum color (how well it matches adjacent areas)? What features of healing and cellular tissue structure are observed when using different materials? Researchers will compare: Autogenous connective tissue grafts (CTG) - the patient's own connective tissue grafts harvested from the palate or maxillary tuberosity Xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) - bioresorbable materials of animal origin (Fibro-Gide® and FibroMatrix®) that do not require harvesting the patient's own tissue Participants will: Undergo a surgical procedure to increase soft tissue volume in the area of implant placement (using one of four methods assigned randomly) Attend clinic visits for follow-up examinations and assessments: * Before surgery * 3 months after surgery * 6 months after surgery Undergo additional examinations: * 3D intraoral scanning to assess changes in tissue volume * Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure gum thickness * Polarized-light photography to evaluate gum color * Collection of a small tissue sample (biopsy) for laboratory analysis of tissue structure and cellular composition
Gender: All
Ages: 21 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2026-05-22