Clinical Research Directory

Comparison Between Xenograft and Extended PRF as Jumping Gap Grafting Material Versus Natural Healing of the Socket Without Any Material.

This study aims to clinically and digitally evaluate immediate implants placed in mandibular molar extraction sockets and compare the outcomes of xenograft, e-PRF, and no grafting material within the jumping gap.

Labial Bone Thickness Change in Immediate Implant Placement In Maxillary Esthetic Zone

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of distance between the implant and the bone on the resultant bone thickness adjacent to the implant in place of a broken down tooth that happens to be bounded by two natural teeth. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the horizontal implant position (and hence the gap between the implant and the socket wall i.e. jumping gap) affect the resultant labial bone thickness? Will it affect the quality of soft tissue, esthetics and patient satisfaction? Participants will have an implant placed using a surgical guide with a jumping gap either less than 2 mm or equal or more than 2 mm and will be asked to visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups, radiographs, and readings.

Thymoquinone Around Immediate Implant

use of Thymoquinone hydrogel with bone graft in comparison to bone graft only around immediate implant-this hydrogel fill the jumping zone in comparison to using hydrogel bone graft only to increase primary stability and enhance osseointegration