Clinical Research Directory

FM Technique in Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Single-Arm Clinical Study

This trial tests whether a new method (FM) for moving back teeth can shorten clear-aligner treatment. All participants use FM, which moves the canine and first molar back together instead of one tooth at a time like the standard method. There is no comparison group; results will be compared with published studies and past records to plan a larger direct comparison. Participants wear FM aligners, have check-ups, scans, and photos at the start and at about 3 months, then check-ups every 1-3 months, for about 6 months total. People aged 12-45 with misaligned teeth needing back teeth moved back, healthy gums, and no need for tooth removal or jaw surgery can join.

Evaluation of Corticotomy-Assisted Canine Retraction Rate

The goal of this split-mouth randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of corticotomy on maxillary canine retraction rate compared to conventional orthodontic techniques. Each participant acts as their own control. After bilateral maxillary first premolar extractions, one quadrant is randomly assigned to receive corticotomy before retraction, while the contralateral quadrant undergoes standard orthodontic retraction without corticotomy.

Comparison of Orthodontic Molar Protraction With and Without Adjunctive Surgery

This study will compare orthodontic molar protraction with and without adjunctive periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontic (PAOO) surgery prior to orthodontic tooth movement. To the investigators' knowledge, this type of molar retraction in adult patients has not been compared with and without the adjunctive use of PAOO for differences in clinical linear tooth movement and patient centered outcomes (discomfort, change in daily activities, satisfaction with esthetic outcomes) in a controlled study.

Periodontal Health in Adults Treated With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances or Clear Aligners

This prospective observational study will compare the effects of fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligners on periodontal health during the initial three months of orthodontic treatment. Thirty systemically healthy adults will be included in two groups of fifteen according to the orthodontic treatment modality received. Prior to appliance placement, all participants will undergo standardized non-surgical periodontal treatment and receive oral hygiene instructions. Periodontal parameters, including plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level, will be assessed at baseline, following periodontal treatment, and at the third month of orthodontic therapy. Patient-reported outcomes related to oral health-related quality of life, gingival symptoms, and oral hygiene difficulty will also be evaluated. The study aims to determine whether periodontal and patient-reported outcomes differ between fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligners during the early phase of orthodontic treatment.

This RCT Compares the Clinical Performance, Stability, and Patient Perception of Different Diameters Orthodontic Miniscrews in the Posterior Maxilla Buccal Side.

Researchers will compare miniscrews with diameters of 1.3 millimeters and 1.6 millimeters. Both sizes are 8 millimeters long and will be placed between the roots of the first and second molar teeth at the back of the upper jaw. Participants will be assigned by chance to one of the two groups. Participants will: * Have miniscrews of their assigned size placed as part of their treatment with braces. * Have the miniscrews and surrounding gums checked after placement and at monthly orthodontic appointments for six months. * Complete questionnaires immediately after placement and at monthly appointments for six months to report pain, chewing difficulties, food getting trapped around the miniscrews, and avoidance of smiling.

Effects of Power Arm Application in Maxillary Canine Distalization

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of a canine distalization force applied between power arms placed on the maxillary canine and first molar, in comparison with the classical method without power arms. Following maxillary first premolar extraction, canine distalization is commonly accompanied by undesirable effects such as distal tipping and distopalatal rotation of the canine and mesial movement (anchorage loss) of the first molar. By bringing the applied force closer to the teeth's centers of resistance through power arms, the study seeks to move the canine into the extraction space as close to parallel (bodily) movement as possible. The hypothesis is that applying force with Ni-Ti closed-coil springs between power arms placed on the molar and canine teeth reduces undesirable dental effects such as rotation, tipping and anchorage loss during distalization compared with the classical method. In a split-mouth design, 16 patients with maxillary first premolar extractions and moderate anchorage requirement receive power-arm mechanics on one randomly selected side (study side) and conventional mechanics on the other side (control side), with a 150 g force on both sides, over three months of canine distalization.

Impact of Anterior Cross Bite Treatment on Children's Speech Performance

The goal of this prospective, single-arm clinical trial is to evaluate the speech performance of children with anterior dental crossbite before and after correction. Also, to assess the impact of early interceptive orthodontic treatment in the mixed dentition stage to correct the anterior dental crossbite on the quality of life of children. Fifty children of both sexes aged from 8 to 10 years were enrolled and evaluated using the study's inclusion \& exclusion criteria. before beginning interceptive orthodontic treatment, each child underwent full mouth treatment. then, using a removable anterior expansion screw along with posterior bite planes to treat the anterior crossbite. All children were subjected to the Protocol of speech evaluation before appliance insertion and after complete correction of anterior crossbite. Also, the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ 8-10) in the Brazilian version was used to gauge how the anterior crossbite affected the children's oral health-related quality of life.

Additional Palatal Force in Maxillary Canine Distalization

In orthodontic treatment involving extraction of the maxillary first premolars, the canine is distalized into the extraction space using sliding mechanics. Because the retraction force is applied at bracket level and therefore at a distance from the centre of resistance of the tooth, the canine tends to rotate distopalatally and to tip in the sagittal plane instead of translating bodily. These side effects lengthen treatment and increase the load on the posterior anchorage teeth. Power arms are used to bring the line of action of the force closer to the centre of resistance. In addition, because the centre of resistance of the maxillary canine lies palatal to the mid-buccolingual axis of the crown, a force applied from the palatal surface generates a rotational moment opposite in direction to that produced by a buccal force. This trial tested whether dividing a constant total distalizing force between the buccal and the palatal surfaces of the canine, so that the two rotational moments oppose one another, produces a more bodily canine movement than applying the whole force from the buccal side alone. The trial used a split-mouth design: in each participant one maxillary quadrant received the whole force from the buccal side and the contralateral quadrant received half the force buccally and half palatally, with the total force identical on both sides. Canine displacement, rotation, tipping and first molar anchorage loss were measured on superimposed digital models over 12 weeks.

Smartphone App Versus Verbal Motivation for Oral Hygiene in Fixed Orthodontic Patients

This study looked at whether a smartphone app can help patients with fixed braces keep their teeth cleaner than usual spoken advice alone. Fixed braces make plaque harder to remove, which can harm the teeth and gums, so good brushing habits matter. Fifty patients aged 14 to 22 were divided at random into two groups. One group used a purpose-made app ("iTeeth Orthodontics") that sent brushing reminders, timed brushing, and kept a brushing log. The other group received the usual spoken oral-hygiene motivation. Both groups used the same brushes, toothpaste, and rinse, and followed the same cleaning routine. Plaque was measured from photographs at 10 days and at 1, 2, and 3 months, using a computer to calculate how much of each tooth surface was covered by plaque. The two groups were then compared.

Effectiveness of Auxiliary Segmental Lingual Appliances in Leveling the Curve of Wilson at Second Molars

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of auxiliary segmental lingual appliances in leveling the Curve of Wilson at the second molars in patients undergoing labial fixed orthodontic treatment. Patients exhibiting an excessive (deep) Curve of Wilson at the second molar bilaterally (meaning lingually inclined mandibular second molar) will be recruited.. Using a split-mouth design, one side will receive the intervention (auxiliary segmental lingual appliances), while the other side will serve as the control. The variables measured include the Curve of Wilson at the second and first molars, and the distance from the mesiolingual and distolingual cusps of the second molar to the occlusal plane of the first molar. Measurements will be taken on digital impressions at baseline (T0), after leveling with a stainless steel labial archwire (T1), and three months after applying the auxiliary segmental lingual appliances. The effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the two groups.

Clear Aligners With Two Different Change Schedules vs Traditional Braces for People With Crowded Lower Front Teeth

The goal of this clinical trial was to compare two clear aligner treatment plans with traditional braces for treating crowded lower front teeth in adults. Clear aligners were removable plastic trays. Traditional braces were metal brackets and wires. The main questions the study aimed to answer were: How fast did the teeth move? How long did treatment take? How much pain did participants feel? Researchers studied 21 adults aged 18 to 40 years. The adults had mild to moderate crowding of the lower front teeth. They did not have teeth removed for treatment. Researchers assigned participants by chance to one of three groups: Aligner I: clear aligners that moved teeth 0.25 mm per step. Aligner II: clear aligners that moved teeth 0.35 mm per step. Control: traditional braces. Participants: Wore clear aligners for 22 hours a day and changed to a new aligner every 2 weeks, or wore traditional braces that were adjusted every month. Visited the clinic for checkups, tooth scans, and pain checks. Were treated for up to 20 weeks. Researchers measured crowding with a score that showed how crooked the lower front teeth were. They recorded how many weeks treatment took. They asked participants to rate pain on a 0 to 10 scale. A score of 0 meant no pain. A score of 10 meant the worst pain. Researchers found that all three treatments straightened the teeth. Traditional braces worked fastest. The typical participant in the braces group finished in 10 weeks. The typical participant in Aligner II finished in 12 weeks. The typical participant in Aligner I finished in 16 weeks. Pain changed over time in all groups. Clear aligners were not always more comfortable than braces. At weeks 8 and 10, both aligner groups reported more pain than the braces group.

Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy

Patient with class ii division 1 malocclusion who have mild increased overjet will be treated in this study. The efficacy of clear aligners in the treatment of Class II division 1 Malocclusion Using Intermaxillary Elastics will be assessed. The skeletal, dental and soft tissues changes resulted by this intervention will be studied and compared with the results of Traditional treatment with fixed appliances. There are two group: 1. a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the clear aligners with class ii elastics. 2. a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the traditional fixed appliances with class ii elastics.

Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Stainless Steel and Titanium-molybdenum Alloy Wires in TAD-supported Segmental Mechanics

The goal of this randomized clinical study is to compare the effectiveness of stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires for maxillary canine retraction using TAD-supported segmental mechanics. The main question it aims to answer is: Which wire material, stainless steel or titanium-molybdenum alloy, provides better outcomes in maxillary canine retraction when used with TAD-supported segmental mechanics? Researchers will compare SS reverse-closing loops with TMA reverse-closing loops to evaluate differences in the rate of canine retraction and canine angulation changes during orthodontic space closure. Participants will: * Receive mini-implants/TADs on both sides of the maxillary arch. * Receive a stainless steel reverse-closing loop on one side and a TMA reverse-closing loop on the contralateral side. * Receive the same standardized force of 150 g on both sides. * Visit the clinic every 4 weeks for a total duration of 4 months. * Undergo OPG radiographs before retraction and after the 4-month study period to assess canine angulation.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Comfort Between Two Clear Aligner Trimming-Line Designs: A Split-Mouth Study

* The trimming-line design of clear aligners (supragingival versus juxtagingival) is a routine clinical decision whose influence on patient-reported comfort has not been established; available evidence on aligner comfort derives almost exclusively from comparisons with fixed appliances. * This observational, cross-sectional study compares two clear aligner trimming-line designs with respect to patient-reported comfort: a supragingival design, whose edge rests on the marginal gingiva, and a juxtagingival design, whose edge follows the gingival contour without covering it. Because the two designs sit differently against the gingival soft tissue, they may be experienced differently during wear. * Participants are patients already wearing one trimming-line design on one dental arch and the other on the contralateral arch; each participant thus serves as their own control. After a minimum of four weeks of wear, participants complete a 20-item questionnaire once, rating the frequency of defined oral experiences for the maxillary and mandibular arch separately on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent). * The questionnaire is anonymous; the design worn on each arch is identified from which of two identical forms a participant completes. Responses for the two designs are compared within each participant. The study evaluates whether trimming-line design is associated with differences in patient-reported comfort.

Maximum Clinical Insertion Torque and Its Association With the Success Rate of Orthodontic Miniscrews

Orthodontic miniscrews provide temporary skeletal anchorage but are lost prematurely in a proportion of cases despite correct placement. The insertion torque generated when a miniscrew is seated has been proposed as a marker of primary stability, but its relationship with clinical success remains uncertain and the existing evidence is limited. This prospective observational cohort study evaluated orthodontic miniscrews placed for skeletal anchorage during routine fixed orthodontic treatment at the postgraduate orthodontic clinic of Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile. The primary objective was to determine whether the maximum clinical insertion torque measured at placement is associated with miniscrew success. Maximum insertion torque and patient-, device-, site-, and treatment-related characteristics were recorded, and each miniscrew was followed until elective removal or failure.

A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Accuracy of the Trimline Design When Treated With SureSmile® Aligners.

This is a three-armed, multicenter clinical study evaluating the SureSmile clear aligner medical device. The primary objective is to confirm the safety and assess the accuracy of different tooth movements. In addition, the study will investigate and compare three different trimline designs: Scalloped, Straight, and Straight Extended.

Influence of Finishing Clear Aligner Marginal Termination Design on Subgingival Periodontal Microbiota During Orthodontic Treatment: A Split-Mouth Study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the edge design of a finishing orthodontic clear aligner at the gumline affects the bacteria living in the groove between the tooth and the gum (the gingival sulcus) in patients undergoing the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment. The main question it aims to answer is: \- Does a supragingival aligner edge design - which covers approximately 2 mm of gum tissue - lead to higher levels of disease-associated bacteria in the gingival sulcus compared to a juxtagingival edge design that follows the gumline exactly, after 4 and 8 weeks of aligner wear? Researchers will compare the supragingival trimming-line design to the juxtagingival festooned design to see if covering gum tissue with the aligner edge creates conditions that favor the growth of anaerobic bacteria associated with gum disease. Participants will: * Wear finishing clear aligners with both designs simultaneously - one design on the upper jaw and one on the lower jaw - for 8 weeks * Provide fluid samples from the gum groove at 3 visits: at the start of treatment (baseline), at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks. Two aligner edge designs are compared: a supragingival design, which has a straight horizontal edge positioned approximately 2 mm over the gumline, covering approximately 2 mm of gum tissue with direct contact but without entering the gum groove itself, and a juxtagingival design, which follows the natural scalloped shape of the gumline exactly, terminating at the free gingival margin without covering gum tissue and without entering the groove. The biological rationale for comparing these two designs is the following: the supragingival design, by covering 2 mm of gum tissue, creates a partially enclosed space at the entrance of the gum groove, potentially reducing the clearance of saliva and limiting oxygen access to that area. These conditions may favor the growth of anaerobic bacteria associated with gum disease. The juxtagingival design, by following the gum contour exactly at its edge, leaves the gum groove entrance more accessible to saliva and oxygen, potentially maintaining a less favorable environment for those bacteria. Each participant receives both designs at the same time - one on the upper jaw and one on the lower jaw - and serves as their own comparison group. This within-person (split-mouth) approach eliminates differences between individuals in general health, oral hygiene habits, and saliva composition, making the comparison between the two designs more precise. Samples are analyzed using the PeriodontScreen Real-TM real-time PCR kit (Sacace Biotechnologies Srl, Como, Italy; CE-marked in vitro diagnostic device), which detects and quantifies seven bacteria known to cause gum disease: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Prevotella intermedia. The main measurement is the number of these seven bacteria that exceed the clinically significant concentration threshold defined by the kit at each jaw arch and time point. A score of 0 means none of the seven bacteria exceed the threshold; a score of 7 means all seven do. The study hypothesis is that the supragingival trimming-line design - by covering gingival tissue and partially enclosing the sulcus entrance - creates microenvironmental conditions that favor anaerobic periodontal pathogen colonization, resulting in higher pathogen burden scores compared to the juxtagingival design after 4 and 8 weeks of finishing aligner wear. The study is conducted during the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, when planned tooth movements are minimal (no more than 0.5 mm per tooth), so that any differences in bacterial levels can be attributed to aligner edge design rather than to tooth movement forces.

3D-Printed vs Conventional Fixed Retainers After Orthodontic Treatment

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical performance of two types of three-dimensionally printed fixed retainers (Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium Grade 5) with the conventional multistranded stainless steel fixed retainer following orthodontic treatment. Thirty-six participants will be randomly allocated into three parallel groups with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The primary outcome is post-treatment stability assessed by Little's Irregularity Index and lower arch dimensions. Secondary outcomes include bond failure rate and periodontal parameters over a 12-month follow-up period.

Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Versus Band-and-Loop Space Maintainers in Children: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study

This split-mouth randomized clinical study aims to compare the clinical performance of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin (GFRCR) space maintainers with conventional band-and-loop (B\&L) space maintainers following premature loss of primary molars in children. Twenty children aged 5-8 years with bilateral premature loss of comparable primary molars will receive a GFRCR appliance on one side of the dental arch and a conventional B\&L appliance on the contralateral side. Participants will be evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 months for appliance retention, gingival health, dental caries around the abutment teeth, and preservation of the extraction space. The study aims to determine whether GFRCR space maintainers provide clinical performance comparable to conventional B\&L appliances while offering the advantages of improved esthetics and single-visit placement.

Effect of Finishing Clear Aligner Marginal Termination Design (Supragingival vs Juxtagingival) on Aligner Color Stability After 14 Days of Wear: A Split-Mouth Study

* The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether the gumline edge design of a finishing orthodontic clear aligner affects how much the aligner's color changes after 14 days of wear. * The main question is: does a supragingival edge design - a straight edge covering about 2 mm of gum tissue - lead to a different amount of color change in the aligner compared with a juxtagingival edge design that follows the gumline exactly, after 14 days of wear? * Each participant wears finishing clear aligners with both edge designs at the same time - one design on the upper jaw and the other on the lower jaw - and serves as their own comparison (split-mouth). This within-person approach removes differences between individuals in oral hygiene, diet, and saliva. * The aligner's color over six selected teeth (three upper, three lower) is measured with a dental spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V) at placement (day 0) and after 14 days. Each measurement is repeated three times under standardized optical conditions. The amount of color change is expressed as a color-difference value (ΔE). * The study hypothesis is that marginal termination design (supragingival versus juxtagingival) is associated with a difference in the 14-day colorimetric change (ΔE00) of the finishing aligner. * The study is carried out during the finishing (refinement) stage of orthodontic treatment, when only small residual tooth movements remain, so that color changes can be attributed to wear and edge design rather than to tooth movement.

Bone Level Changes Using Clear Aligners Compared to Fixed Appliances in Non-Extraction Treatment of Adults

This study compares two common ways of straightening teeth in adults who have mild-to-moderate crowding of the lower front teeth and do not need any teeth removed: clear aligners and traditional fixed braces. The main aim is to find out whether the two methods differ in how they affect the bone that surrounds the teeth. Using three-dimensional X-ray scans (cone-beam CT) and digital models of the teeth taken before and during treatment, the researchers measure the level and thickness of the bone around the lower front teeth, the tilt (inclination) of the lower front teeth, and how quickly the crowding is corrected. Adults are randomly assigned to receive either clear aligners or fixed braces, and the same measurements are compared between the two groups over about six months.

Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding.

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques for fixed orthodontic bracket placement in adolescent patients requiring treatment in both dental arches. Each participant will receive both bonding techniques, with allocation of the digital and conventional indirect bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization. The study will evaluate the time required to complete bracket bonding procedures and the early clinical performance of the two techniques, assessed by bracket failure within the first month after appliance placement.

Optimizing Orthodontic Appliances Efficiency With Remote Dental Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

The decision on aligner changing is based on orthodontists' personal experience and common knowledge that an approximated time span for the aligner have exhausted its biological efficacy. However, a one size fits all approach is not always ideal, as an average determined time is not taken into account of a patient's individual biological response. The aligners could be progressed earlier than the determined time, or they may stay inactive for a while, waiting for the in-office visit. Dental MonitoringTM is the only available technology that provides 3D monitoring of teeth movement, reconstructs 3D digital models remotely, and auto-detect clinical situations by their patented AI algorithms. The investigators have reported high accuracy of DMTM to monitor the tooth movement in vitro. However, the efficacy of DMTM on orthodontic treatment and the accuracy of DMTM in the orthodontic patients has not been investigated yet. In this proposal, the investigators are implementing the Dental MonitoringTM application and 3D tracking of tooth movement powered by AI algorisms as a novel tool to customize aligner changing intervals. The ultimate goal is to reduce in-office visits and treatment duration while maintaining regular monitoring, thus not jeopardizing expected results. It is imperative to investigate the Teledentistry for its effectiveness, reliability, ease of use, patient satisfaction, and value on the overall health and oral health system, especially as a critical tool during public health emergency situations.

Postural Assessment in Patients With Malocclusions

This observational cross-sectional study aims to investigate the association between skeletal malocclusions and body posture using three-dimensional postural analysis. Patients will undergo cephalometric assessment, temporomandibular disorder evaluation using the Helkimo index, and non-invasive postural evaluation using the Spine 3D system, based on rasterstereography technology. Postural parameters, including thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, trunk inclination, pelvic asymmetry, and spinal deviations, will be analysed in relation to skeletal malocclusion classes and temporomandibular disorders. The study seeks to improve the understanding of the potential interactions between the stomatognathic system and global body posture and to support a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach in orthodontic patients.