Clinical Research Directory

Salivary Free Amino Acid Profiles in Periodontitis: Associations With Clinical Parameters and Dynamic Responses to Non Surgical Therapy

\# Brief Summary (Word count: 198) This combined observational and interventional study investigates salivary amino acid profiles and their connections to periodontal conditions, as well as how these substances change after standard non-surgical gum treatment. It recruits adults aged 20 to 50, including healthy volunteers, people with gingivitis and periodontitis. The study is approved by the institutional ethics committee with the ID WCHSIRB-D-2023-370. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do salivary free amino acid levels differ across people with healthy gums, gingivitis and periodontitis? Are changes in salivary branched-chain amino acids related to improved gum health after treatment? Researchers compare three groups in the observational part and track periodontitis patients to assess treatment effects. All participants go through eligibility screening, full periodontal checks and morning saliva collection. 45 participants complete only one baseline visit. Another 32 periodontitis patients receive standard therapy and return for re-examinations at 6 and 12 weeks. Saliva samples are tested for amino acid concentrations. Statistical analysis will explore the correlation between salivary markers and gum conditions. The results may aid clinical evaluation and management of periodontal diseases.

A Non-inferiority Study of Laser Combined With Ultrasonic Debridement Therapy (LCUDT) Versus Manual Combined With Ultrasonic Debridement Therapy (MCUDT) in the Treatment of Periodontitis

The rate of periodontal health among adults and the elderly in China is less than 10%, with the prevalence of severe periodontitis reaching 30.6% in those aged 35 and above. While conventional periodontal treatment (ultrasonic combined with manual subgingival scaling) is effective, it has significant drawbacks: it is technically demanding, time-consuming, and often causes patients considerable pain and discomfort. This can lead to poor treatment compliance, postoperative tissue damage, bleeding, and root sensitivity.Lasers, such as the Nd:YAG laser, offer advantages like antibacterial effects and minimally invasive debridement. Combining ultrasonic with laser therapy may improve patient comfort, but there is currently insufficient evidence to prove that its clinical efficacy is non-inferior to traditional manual scaling.This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy, patient acceptance, and postoperative recovery between "ultrasonic combined with laser debridement" and "ultrasonic combined with manual mechanical debridement."