Clinical Research Directory

Analysis of Life-threatening ARrhythMias After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at increased risk of malignant cardiac arrhythmias (MA), such as sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Therefore, patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are continuously monitored for a minimum of 24 hours after onset symptoms. Longer monitoring is advised in patients at intermediate to high risk of cardiac arrhythmias, however this risk stratification is not evidence based. Hospitalization, particularly in STEMI patients, is advised for a minimum of 48-72 hours. AMI care requires a substantial commitment of bed capacity and staff, resulting in high healthcare costs. In patients who have undergone acute PCI (such as STEMI patients or NSTEMI patients with persistent symptoms), monitoring is primarily aimed at early recognition of MA and signs of persistent or recurrent ischaemia after the intervention. In NSTEMI/UAP patients still awaiting invasive treatment, the emphasis lies on detecting increasing ischaemia in the as-yet untreated coronary vessel, as well as identifying arrhythmias that may arise as a result. The true incidence of MA cannot be precisely established due to heterogeneity in the literature, and moreover varies between patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina pectoris, owing to differences in disease process and care pathway. A better understanding of the current incidence and risk of MA in patients with ACS may contribute to optimizing the monitoring of this patient group, thereby enabling more efficient use of hospital beds and healthcare staff. This prospective quality registry therefore aims to establish the current incidence of MA in ACS patients and to identify potential predictors of MA, while also taking into account other acute complications such as asystole and pulseless electrical activity (PEA).

Emergency Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

This study will assess the feasibility of performing pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct to conventional Advanced Life Support (ALS) in patients suffering from non-traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). As well as providing valuable insights into the technical feasibility of performing this procedure as part of a resuscitation attempt, the study will also document the beneficial physiological effects of REBOA in this group of patients.

Abdominal Aortic Tourniquet Application for Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

The aim of the study is to investigate whether occluding the abdominal aorta with an external device could be a potential therapeutic option in cases of non-traumatic cardiac arrest occurring outside of a hospital. In cardiac arrest, the heart suddenly stops beating, causing the circulation of blood to collapse. In this situation, vital organs-especially the brain and the heart itself-are no longer adequately supplied with oxygen. Without immediate treatment, severe damage or death occurs within minutes. The study therefore examines a specific intervention: the temporary occlusion of the abdominal aorta, which carries blood to the lower regions of the body. If this artery is blocked for a short period, the available blood can be redirected more effectively to the upper parts of the body. In theory, this could improve the oxygen supply to these organs and increase the likelihood that the heart will resume beating or that neurological damage can be reduced.

Surviving PEA in Roanoke (SPEAR) Study

The Carilion Clinic and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, in conjunction with Roanoke Fire-EMS, Botetourt County Department of Fire \& EMS and Salem Fire-EMS, are studying the outcomes of patients experiencing Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA). PEA refers to a type of cardiac arrest in which there is normal electrical activity in the heart however the heart still fails to contract to generate a pulse. Without heart contractions, which normally generates a pulse, the brain and other important organs fail to receive blood and oxygen. Unfortunately, the majority (97.3%) of patients that experience this rhythm do not survive and most don't even make it to the hospital. This study is trying to determine if the administration of a High Calcium, Low Sodium (HCLS) fluid in pre-hospital care will improve the chances of survival. Generally, a sodium (salt) solution is provided to patients experiencing cardiac arrest. Studies have shown that lower sodium and higher calcium content may activate certain parts of the heart cells required to generate a pulse under PEA conditions. This study is a double-blind, prospective, clinical trial. PEA patients will randomly receive either routine fluid therapy (salt solution) or a HCLS solution. While HCLS solution is not the standard fluid used by EMS providers responding to PEA, it is composed of FDA approved components and is occasionally used by EMS providers at their discretion in treating PEA. It is predicted that HCLS will either improve PEA survival or deliver similar outcomes as routine treatment. All patients will receive standard, high quality cardiac arrest and post-cardiac arrest care regardless of assigned treatment group.