Clinical Research Directory

Clinical Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns in Restoring Primary Anterior Teeth

This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates and compares the clinical success and performance of prefabricated Bioflx crowns versus conventional Celluloid strip crowns in the restoration of badly decayed or traumatized primary anterior teeth.

Clinical Performance and Failure Rates of Restorations Following Pediatric Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia

Full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (GA) is frequently required for young children with extensive dental caries, behavioral challenges, or special healthcare needs. Although various restorative materials and treatment approaches are used during comprehensive dental rehabilitation, evidence regarding their long-term clinical performance and failure rates remains limited. Objective: This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rates of restorative materials and methods employed during full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia in children over a two-year follow-up period. Methods: Children undergoing full-mouth dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia will be enrolled and followed prospectively for 24 months. Restorative procedures, including direct and indirect restorative treatments, pulp therapy-associated restorations, and full-coverage restorations, will be performed according to standardized clinical protocols. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at scheduled follow-up visits to assess restoration survival, integrity, recurrent caries, need for retreatment, and restoration failure. Failure rates and factors associated with restoration success or failure will be analyzed.

Composite Restorations in Primary Molars

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of direct restorations with two different indirect composite systems in primary teeth.

Clinical Performance of Novel Coconut Based Restorative Material.

A triple-blind, parallel group, randomized trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Participants randomly allocated into two groups A and B. In group A, nano-reinforced glass ionomer restoration will be utilized while in group B, glass ionomer restoration without nanoparticles was used. Parameters of clinical performance measured will be: A. Surface structure B. Anatomical shape C. marginal adhesion. Clinical performance of Restorations will be assessed with4-level Ryge's scale at baseline, after 1, 3 and 6 months. The numerical Ryge's scale will be used for comparison of quality of restoration in subsequent control clinical examinations and tracking its changes over time. Parameters will be evaluated on standardized scale 0-3. Restorations that will be rated 0 (very good - ideal condition) and 1 (satisfying - requiring minor corrections) will be considered clinically acceptable. Restorations with rating 2 (need for deferred replacement of the restoration) or 3 (unacceptable - restoration needs to be replaced immediately) will be considered clinically unacceptable.