Clinical Research Directory

Effect of FPP on Cutaneous Barrier Integrity

This pilot study will test how Fermented Papaya Preparation (FPP) impacts overall TEWL of areas that commonly display diminished barrier function, such as the skin from face, arms, and hands. Areas of diminished barrier function are defined as those not visible to the eye but identified as areas of high transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as measured by a non-invasive pen-like device. A TEWL value of 20 or higher at a location would be considered high TEWL. Participants will attend 5 visits over 20 weeks, with 12-weeks of FPP treatment, and 8-weeks of follow-up.

Cholesterol Cream vs Urea Cream for Skin Barrier and Quality of Life in Ichthyosis

This study looks at whether a cream containing 10% cholesterol works better than a cream containing 10% urea for people with autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis (ARCI), a rare inherited skin condition that causes dry, thickened, scaly skin from birth. People with ARCI have a weakened skin barrier because their skin cannot properly produce or arrange the natural fats (lipids) needed to keep moisture in and irritants out. This leads to excessive water loss through the skin, dryness, itching, cracking, and a higher risk of skin infections. The current standard treatment is urea cream, which helps soften and remove scale but does not repair the underlying fat structure of the skin barrier. Cholesterol is one of the key natural fats that makes up a healthy skin barrier, so applying it directly to the skin may help rebuild that barrier more effectively than urea. In this study, each participant will have one cream applied to one side of the body and the other cream applied to the matching area on the opposite side, so that each person acts as their own comparison. Researchers will measure how much water the skin loses (transepidermal water loss), skin hydration, and skin pH before and after treatment. They will also assess dryness and itching, take standardized clinical photographs, and ask participants to complete quality-of-life questionnaires (the Dermatology Life Quality Index, or its children's version, the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index) as well as a satisfaction questionnaire for each cream. The goal is to find out whether cholesterol cream restores the skin barrier better than urea cream, reduces dryness and itching more effectively, and leads to a better quality of life for people living with ARCI. The results may help guide more targeted skin care recommendations for this rare genetic condition. This study is being conducted at the Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok, Thailand, and has been approved by the Institute's Ethics Committee.

Silicone Barrier Spray Versus Zinc Oxide Ointment for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis

Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is a common skin condition among long-term care residents and is caused by prolonged exposure to urine or feces. IAD can lead to skin irritation, discomfort, impaired skin integrity, and an increased risk of secondary complications. Structured skin care, including cleansing and barrier protection, is recommended for the prevention and management of IAD. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a silicone barrier spray compared with zinc oxide ointment as part of a structured skin care program for residents with mild IAD in a long-term care facility. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either silicone barrier spray or zinc oxide ointment following routine skin cleansing. Clinical severity of IAD and skin barrier function were assessed at baseline, Day 7, and Day 14 using standardized clinical and biophysical measurements, including IAD severity score, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, skin pH, and skin temperature. The study aimed to determine whether silicone barrier spray provides comparable or improved outcomes compared with conventional zinc oxide ointment in the management of mild IAD.