Clinical Research Directory

Evaluation of the Effect of Smoking on Palatal Donor Site Tissue Profile in the Success of Connective Tissue Grafts

This single-center prospective clinical study investigates how smoking affects palatal donor site tissue biology and, in turn, the success of connective tissue grafts used in root coverage surgery. A total of 24 systemically healthy patients with Cairo Type 1 (recession type 1 \[RT1\]) gingival recession will be enrolled: 12 smokers and 12 non-smokers. All participants will receive a coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG) harvested from the palatal donor site. Both donor and recipient sites will be assessed at baseline and postoperatively (2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months) using ultra-high frequency ultrasonography (UHFUS) to measure tissue thickness, echogenicity, structural integrity, and vascularization. Residual connective tissue fragments obtained during routine graft preparation will undergo histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical analysis (including COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, α-SMA, CD31, Factor XIIIa, and IL-33). Smoking status will be biochemically confirmed via salivary cotinine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Clinical outcomes (recession depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue height, percentage of root coverage) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be compared between groups. Primary Hypothesis: Smoking negatively affects palatal donor site biology, impairing the clinical and ultrasonographic healing outcomes of CAF + CTG procedures.

Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft for Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Defects

Peri-implant soft-tissue defects will be treated with either a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX; test group) or an autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG; control group) following implant placement in patients with a single missing tooth. After a mid-crestal incision and full-thickness flap elevation, the graft material will be positioned over the crest beneath the buccal flap and stabilized, followed by tension-free primary closure. Peri-implant soft-tissue thickness, echo intensity, and vascularization will be assessed non-invasively using high-resolution intraoral ultrasonography and Power Doppler imaging. Clinical periodontal parameters and patient-reported outcomes, including pain perception (visual analog scale), swelling, fatigue, analgesic consumption, and wound healing, will be recorded. These outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and on the 1st week, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months. At the 6th month, gingival biopsy samples obtained during healing abutment placement will be evaluated histologically and immunohistochemically (CD11c, CD163, COL1, COL3, MMP-1, TIMP-1) to compare the biological integration of the two graft materials.

The Use of a Porcine Collagen Matrix for the Prevention of Buccal Bone Wall Resorption During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone.

Aim: To provide a comparative assessment of the clinical and radiographic effect of porcine collagen matrix when placed buccally at the time of single implant placement in the aesthetic zone vs autogenous connective tissue graft in terms of buccal bone resorption and soft tissue augmentation 6 months post operative. Histological assessment and patient reported outcomes were reported

Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area

After atraumatic tooth extraction and the assessment of the feasibility of immediate implant placement, patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment concepts: 1. Immediate Implant Placement and Immediate Provisionalization 2. Alveolar Ridge Preservation. After 4 months of healing an implant will be placed with simultaneous GBR and/or Soft Tissue Augmentation procedures, if needed. 3. Spontaneous Healing of the socket. After 4 months of healing, an implant will be placedwith simultaneous GBR and/or Soft Tissue Augmentation procedures, if needed. In all groups, four months after implant placement, a prosthesis will be delivered. From this experimental period onward, patients will be scheduled for maintenance. Clinical, radiographic and volumetric assessment will be performed by clinicians not involved in the surgery and blind with respect to treatment assignment at 1, 3 and 5 years post loading.