Clinical Research Directory

Feasibility Study on the VERAFEYE Imaging and Navigation System for Guided Catheter Ablation Procedures

The objective of the study is to collect data on the usability and integration of the VERAFEYE Imaging and Guidance System in adult patients indicated to undergo a standard of care catheter-based ablation procedure for the treatment of Atrial Flutter (AFL), paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (perAF). Results from this study may be used to guide development and refinement the VERAFEYE Imaging and Guidance System capabilities.

Anatomical Navigation for Guided Electrophysiology in AFL and AFib

The objective of the study is to collect data on the use of the VERAFEYE Anatomical Guidance System in adult patients indicated to undergo a catheter ablation procedure for the treatment of Atrial Flutter (AFL), paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (perAF). The study will collect specific information on management of AFL/AF ablation procedures with the commercial VERAFEYE Anatomical Guidance System including but not limited to acute procedural success , and how the VERAFEYE Anatomical Guidance System is used overall. Results from this study may be used to guide development and refinement the VERAFEYE Anatomical Guidance System.

Pericardiotomy in Cardiac Surgery

PRINCE is an international, multicentre, randomized controlled trial of posterior pericardiotomy in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter undergoing cardiac surgery.

Head-to-Head (H2H) Comparison of Ambulatory Cardiac ECG Monitors in Japan

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the yield of clinically actionable arrhythmias through the end of indicated wear duration in Zio monitor and Heartnote patch ECG devices.

Colchicine For The Prevention Of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation In Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery (COP-AF)

The prevention of perioperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) has the potential to reduce mortality, stroke, and hospital stays in patients undergoing major thoracic surgery. Data from cardiac surgery patients suggest that prevention of perioperative atrial fibrillation using an anti-inflammatory agent, such as colchicine, is feasible. The COP-AF trial will assess whether the administration of oral colchicine will reduce the incidence of perioperative atrial fibrillation and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients undergoing major thoracic surgery.

Home Monitor for AA Burden Detection IIT in TWN

Primary Endpoint: * Early detection rate in Atrial Arrhythmia (AA) burden * Data transmission success rate for overall number of atrial burden collection during the monitoring period Secondary Endpoints: * Atrial burden occurrence at 3/6/12 months post-aATP * Incidence of arrhythmia * Safety: Immediate (\< 24 hours), in-hospital, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months adverse events

International Multicenter Patent foRamen OVale & strokE (IMPROVE) Registry

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a prevalent cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) in young patients. Its role as a cause of cerebrovascular events in the older population is more controversial because of other competing causes are more frequent in the elderly. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that PFO closure is associated with a 59% relative risk reduction in the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. As such, the number of PFO closure procedures are expected to increase substantially in the upcoming years. Real world data (RWD) informing on the medical management, the risk of stroke recurrence, incident atrial fibrillation, and other outcomes in stroke patients with PFO, with and without PFO closure, will become crucial for understanding how results from RCTs are translated into clinical practice globally. The IMPROVE (International Multicenter Patent foRamen OVale \& strokE) Registry is an observational, multicenter, international registry of men and women with an ischemic stroke or TIA. The aim is to enroll 8,800 patient-years at ≥50 sites in ≥20 countries. The IMPROVE Registry will provide important information about the management and related outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke or TIA and PFO throughout different regions of the world and across a wide spectrum of healthcare systems.

Randomized Trial Comparing Diltiazem and Metoprolol For Atrial Fibrillation Rate Control

Atrial Fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF/FL) is the usually irregular beating of the heart and is a rapidly growing cause of hospitalization. Between 1993 to 2007 AF/FL hospitalizations have increased 203% compared to a 71% increase for all hospitalizations. Changing procedure management such as ablation, transesophageal have had a minimal impact on the trends and there is a need to evaluate Emergency Department (ED) management options of AF/FL that may decrease hospitalizations. The most commonly used medications to control heart rate are metoprolol (MET), a beta blocker, or diltiazem (DT), a calcium channel blocker. Beta blockers are medications that cause the heart to beat more slowly and with less force. DT also helps blood vessels open up to improve blood flow. Both DT and MET are used alone or together with other medicines to treat severe chest pain (angina), high blood pressure (hypertension) or rapid heartbeat. Both are equally acceptable according to recent guidelines for AF/FL. There are limited studies comparing MET to DT for rate control for AF/FL. The initial goal for AF/FL management in the Emergency Department is usually rate control. The most commonly used rate control medications are metoprolol (MET), a beta blocker, or diltiazem (DT) a calcium blocker. Three major guidelines, including the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) indicate beta blockers and DT are equally acceptable medications for rate control in AF (3,4,5) assuming no contraindications. There are limited studies comparing beta blockers (BB) to DT for rate control for AF: 1. Demircan, et. al., compared bolus intravenous BB and DT in 40 patients over a 20 minute period. No follow-up information after 20 minutes was reported. No attempt was made to look at intermediate or long term results. No patients converted to normal sinus rhythm over this short treatment period and there was slightly more rate decrease at 20 minutes, with DT versus BB (6). 2. Time from medication administration to heart rate and rhythm control. Additionally, currently guidelines consider BB or DT medications to slow AF/FL; however, there are some suggestions that BB may not only slow heart rate in AF/FL (as does DT) but also increase all AF/FL conversion from AF/FL to normal sinus rhythm(2), and aid in maintaining normal sinus rhythm (NSR) after cardioversion (10). With recent onset AF/FL occurring within 48 hours prior to the arrival to the ED, approximately 50% of AF/FL patients convert to normal rhythm spontaneously within 24 hours after arrival to the ED (6), making evaluation of current limited studies difficult. Thus, the investigators wish to examine the effect of initial medication strategy on time to NSR in a larger sample than has been previously performed. 3. A randomized study of 48 patients in China reported significantly slower heart rate up to 20 minutes with DT 10mg IV versus metoprolol 5mg IV but not after 30 minutes (7). 4. A retrospective study of post-operative coronary bypass patients showed the intravenous administration of the BB, esmolol, to be more effective than DT for rate control and conversion of AF/FL (8). 5. Hassan et al reported no difference in conversion to regular rhythm with esmolol verses DT in a small, under powered, randomized study of fifty ED patients (9). Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 10 patients (42%) in the DT group compared with 10 patients (39%) in the esmolol group (P = 1.0). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate between the two medications at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after initiation of esmolol or DT infusion. Examples of such well quoted strategy trials are the COURAGE trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the PROMISE Trial, a worldwide multi-centered study that is nearing completion goal of 10,000 patients of which, Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC) has enrolled approximately 100 patients. In this trial, patients being evaluated for chest pain will be randomized to two treatment strategies and subsequent outcomes will be recorded. Strategy trials do not attempt to manage treatment after an initial management strategy has been determined by randomization, but, whether the initial treatment affects long-term outcomes. This will be a prospective, randomized study comparing the outcomes of a strategy using either MET or DT in patients with AF presenting to the Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC) ED. After presentation and receiving consent, the patient will be randomized to receive either MET or DT.

Strategies for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in patiEnts Receiving Dialysis 2 (SAFE-D2)

People receiving dialysis are more likely to develop atrial fibrillation (AF), an irregular heartbeat that increases the risk of stroke. Blood-thinning medications (anticoagulants) are commonly used to prevent strokes in people with AF, but it is not known whether they are beneficial for people receiving dialysis because this group has not been well represented in previous clinical trials. As a result, healthcare providers do not have clear evidence to guide treatment decisions. The SAFE-D2 study will compare two approaches to preventing stroke in adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis who have non-valvular AF and are at increased risk of stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance) to receive either apixaban, an oral blood thinner, or no oral anticoagulant, while continuing to receive their usual dialysis and medical care. The main goal of the study is to determine whether apixaban is more effective than no oral anticoagulant at reducing the risk of stroke or blood clots traveling to other parts of the body (systemic embolism). The study will also compare the two approaches with respect to survival, heart-related complications, major bleeding and other bleeding events, hospitalizations, dialysis access complications, quality of life, and the overall balance of benefits and risks. Approximately 848 participants from Canada, Brazil, and Israel will take part in the study. The results of SAFE-D2 are expected to provide important evidence to help patients, families, and healthcare providers make informed decisions about stroke prevention for people receiving dialysis who have atrial fibrillation.

Comparison of LAA-Closure vs Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With NVAF and Status Post Intracranial Bleeding.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In atrial fibrillation, there is a risk that clots can form in the heart, especially in the left atrium. If these clots come loose, there is a risk of stroke. To prevent strokes, patients with atrial fibrillation and status post ICB can be treated with anticoagulants. This medication therapy prevents blood clots from forming in the heart, but can also cause bleeding. Another therapy option is the occlusion of the left atrium. After closure of the left atrium, only a short anticoagulation therapy is necessary until the occluder has healed. The aim of the study is to compare these two treatment approaches. In this study only already approved drugs and occlusion systems will be used.

HeartBeam ECG Registry

The HeartBeam ECG Registry will collect ECG recordings acquired with the HeartBeam System with relevant clinical information in clinical settings.

Anteroposterior Versus Anterolateral Electrode Position for Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm disorder (arrhythmia) worldwide. Nearly 40 million people are affected by atrial fibrillation worldwide, and this number is expected to increase by over 50% by 2050. Atrial fibrillation can cause strokes, heart attacks, heart failure, poor quality of life and even death. Almost half a million deaths worldwide are expected to be related to atrial fibrillation by 2050, and many billions of dollars are spent on atrial fibrillation related healthcare in North America every year. We believe health outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation, and healthcare costs associated with treating atrial fibrillation could be improved by optimizing existing treatments for atrial fibrillation and maximizing the likelihood of restoring normal heart rhythm. This allows them to benefit from lower stroke risk, better heart function, fewer symptoms and increased quality of life. Restoring normal sinus rhythm earlier prevents atrial fibrillation from causing permanent structural damage to the heart that in turn, makes atrial fibrillation intractable. Furthermore, patients in whom initial attempts to control atrial fibrillation are unsuccessful frequently require more medications or invasive catheter ablation procedures which are costly and carry substantial risk. Electrical cardioversion is the main way physicians restore normal heart rhythm. In this procedure, the heart is "shocked" back into normal rhythm using two electrodes on the chest. Done correctly, this procedure is safe and effective. Many things are known about electrical cardioversion, for example, the best type and amount of electricity to use. What we don't know is the best position of the electrodes on the chest and whether applying direct, physical pressure to the electrodes makes cardioversion more successful. Our prior research suggests that improving positioning and applying pressure may improve cardioversion, but this finding needs to be verified with a rigorous, dedicated trial. This study will demonstrate whether front-to-back, or front-to-side placement of the electrodes is more effective for electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. We will also demonstrate whether manually applying pressure to the electrodes makes cardioversion more effective. Should our trial demonstrate a benefit for these techniques, we expect them to be universally applied around the world. Because hundreds of thousands of cardioversions are done each year, even small increases in cardioversion success means thousands fewer patients progress to needing more medications or invasive procedures to manage their atrial fibrillation. We will study consenting adults presenting for non-urgent cardioversion of their atrial fibrillation. After explaining the study to participants and gaining their consent, we will randomly assign them to front-to-side or front-to-back electrode placement. Patients who remain in atrial fibrillation after the first shock will randomly receive either manual pressure or not. We will compare the success of cardioversion for front-side versus front-back electrode placement, and for manual pressure versus none. We will evaluate success by using electrocardiograms to assess for restoration of the heart rhythm back to normal. We hypothesize that anterolateral electrode positioning is superior to anteroposterior electrode positioning. We also hypothesize that manual pressure is effective relative to none, when applied in patients who have had one unsuccessful shock already.

Empiric Pulsed Field Pulmonary Vein Isolation During Atrial Tachycardia Ablation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

This is a prospective, single-arm intervention trial whereby we will test the safety and efficacy of performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) in adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) who are presenting for atrial tachycardia (AT) ablation.

Cardiologist-Administered Midazolam vs. Anaesthesiologist-Assisted Propofol Sedation For Transoesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Irregular heart rhythms, known as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, are common conditions that can increase the risk of stroke and heart failure. A standard treatment to restore a normal rhythm is a controlled electric shock, known as cardioversion. However, if the irregular rhythm has lasted more than 24 hours, if the duration is uncertain, and if the patient has not been on blood-thinning medication for at least three weeks, doctors must first check for blood clots in the heart. This is done using a special ultrasound scan of the heart through the food pipe. Both the scan and the electric shock treatment require sedation to make the patient relaxed or asleep. The scan uses mild sedation from a cardiologist, while the shock needs a stronger sedative given by an anaesthesiologist. But needing this extra doctor can cause delays, so patients often wait longer for treatment and to go home. This study will test whether a cardiologist can safely handle both steps using a sedative called midazolam. This study will include 220 adults at multiple hospitals in Denmark and compare this new approach to standard care. Researchers will track how quickly patients go home, how well the treatment works, any serious side effects, what patients think about the experience, and how much money can be saved. If proven safe and effective, this new method could reduce treatment delays, shorten hospital stays, and lower healthcare costs-ultimately improving care for patients and making the healthcare system more efficient.

Baseline Atrial Fibrosis Predicts Risk for Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

The study aims to evaluate and compare the incidence of atrial arrhythmias (including Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF), atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia) stratified by baseline Utah fibrosis stages and overall fibrosis (%) of the left atrial wall area. The investigators hypothesize that patients with a higher baseline Utah fibrosis staging will experience a higher incidence of POAF. The study also aims to evaluate and compare the in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay (LOS), complication rates (strokes, pneumonia, respiratory failure etc.) of the different Utah fibrosis stage cohorts. Perform cost analysis and compare between patients with POAF and patients without POAF. The investigators hypothesize that patients experiencing POAF will have a higher mortality rate, longer LOS, greater complications, and therefore, additional hospital costs.

Left Atrial Imaging Prior to Cardioversion: Leveraging Computed Tomography to Rule Out Thrombus in The Emergency Department (LA CLOTTED)

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn whether patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF) who require heart imaging to rule out a blood clot before cardioversion would benefit from cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCT) in the emergency department (ED) compared to current standard of care management. This will be a multicenter trial evaluating whether CCT-facilitated cardioversion in the ED reduces hospital admission, reduces repeat presentations to hospital and improves patient quality of life compared to the current standard of care. Participants will undergo CCT-facilitated cardioversion or be treated according to current standard of care while in the ED and complete quality of life questionnaires in the ED and follow-up at 30 days.

Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively

The AFFELECT -study compares two types of treatment modalities for acute atrial fibrillation or flutter for patients in whom rhythm control is desirable. The main purpose is to observe if these arrhythmias can be safely treated electively (within 5-9 days). All patients are recruited in the emergency department. Patients must be in good clinical condition so that they can be discharged regardless to which treatment modality is randomly selected to them. Patients randomized to conventional care are treated conventionally which means acute rhythm control is applied by electrical or medical cardioversion in the emergency department (within 48 hours of onset of the arrhythmia). Patients randomized to elective care are discharged immediately after adequate temporary rhythm control is assured. All patients will visit a cardiologist out-patient clinic at approximately one week after the emergency room visit. Patients randomized to elective treatment and still in atrial fibrillation or in atrial flutter will be restored to sinus rhythm by electrical or medical cardioversion at the out-patient clinic. Cardiovascular status and treatment options are evaluated for all patients. Anticoagulation is managed according existing guidelines for all patients. Due to possibility of delayed cardioversion in the interventional group (elective care group), all patients receive anticoagulation before the out-patient clinic despite their thromboembolic risk. All patients who have not received adequate anticoagulation for three weeks prior to the delayed cardioversion will undergo a transesophageal cardiac ultrasound to ensure they are not in excess risk for thromboembolic events. Patients randomized to elective treatment have the possibility to opt-out and undergo acute cardioversion if their symptoms are unmanageable during the first week before the out-patient clinical. All patients are monitored for their symptoms by a standardized quality-of-life questionnaire and for possibly required acute medical interventions during the first week and one month after the out-patient clinic. After one month, all patients undergo an electrocardiography (ECG) to ensure the maintenance of normal rhythm in both treatment groups. After the months follow-up all patients are subsequently monitored for a maximum of five years for need of medical interventions due to atrial fibrillation of atrial flutter. New antiarrhythmics such as flecainide are not prescribed during the first month.

iCLAS™ Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study

A prospective, single-arm, multi-center study designed to collect real world safety and performance data of the Adagio Medical iCLAS Cryoablation System in the treatment of drug refractory, recurrent, symptomatic, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF), Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PsAF), and Atrial Flutter (AFL).

Storytelling for Reducing Gap in Anticoagulation Use in African Americans With Atrial Fibrillation

The overall goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a previously developed storytelling intervention on anticoagulation (AC) initiation/persistence in African American and Black patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter. The investigators hope to gain knowledge that may help treat atrial fibrillation or flutter and lower stroke and adverse cardiovascular event risks for African American and Black patients by increasing the use of blood thinning medications known as anticoagulants.

A Study to Select the Dose and Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug Refralon®, Tablets, 1 mg for Long-term Use to Prevent Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter After Terminating Its Persistent Form

Refralon® tablets in two different doses (1 or 2 tablets per day) will be evaluated vs. placebo in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter after synus rhythm restoration in order to prevent recurrence of arrhythmia. Efficacy and safety of Refralon® tablets will be studied, its optimal dose will be selected and its pharmacokinetics will be evaluated in 14 days, 1, 3 and 6 months.

Efficacy of Early Rhythm Control Therapy in Patients With Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation

The goal of this study to find out the efficacy of early rhythm therapy in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation detected by Cardiac Electronic Implantable Devices. Early rhythm therapy includes antiarrhythmic drug, cardioversion, and catheter ablation. The general control group receives general management without the above atrial fibrillation rhythm control treatment. Researchers will compare early rhythm control groups to general control groups to see if early rhythm therapy works to reduce the atrial fibrillation burden by 50% or more, or decrease the incidence of clinical AF documentation. Participants will: * Randomly allocated to two groups at a 1:1 ratio. * Receive the treatment according to their assigned group. * Visit the clinic once every three months for checkups and tests.

Pulsed-Field Ablation for Recurrent Atypical Atrial Flutter

Recurrent atypical atrial flutter (AFL) after prior atrial fibrillation or flutter ablation remains challenging to treat, and conventional radiofrequency ablation may be limited by incomplete lesion formation and risk of collateral damage. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) uses non-thermal electric fields to create myocardial lesions with relative sparing of surrounding tissues and may improve the safety and efficacy of ablation for atypical AFL. This prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study will enroll approximately 30 patients with clinically documented recurrent atypical AFL who are referred for elective catheter ablation using a point-by-point pulsed-field ablation system. During the index procedure, detailed electroanatomic mapping will be performed to identify the critical isthmus or circuit, followed by linear or focal PFA and confirmation of bidirectional conduction block. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of procedure- and device-related primary adverse events. The primary effectiveness endpoint is acute procedural success, defined as termination of atypical AFL and establishment of bidirectional block across the targeted lesion set at the end of the procedure. Secondary endpoints include recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia during 12-month follow-up, durability of the linear lesions assessed by repeat electroanatomic mapping at 3 months, changes in atrial scar on cardiac MRI, peri-procedural changes in blood biomarkers, and the rate of serious adverse events related to the procedure or study device.

Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation With a Circular-Shaped Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter

This observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a circular-shaped pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter for CTI ablation under the guidance of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). The main question it aims to answer is: Is the circular-shaped PFA catheter an effective and safe tool for achieving acute success for CTI ablation? Patients undergoing CTI ablation with a circular-shaped PFA catheter will be prospectively enrolled.

Systematic Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness for Long-Term Management of Stable Atrial Tachycardia in Inpatient and Outpatient Environments

The aim is to analyze long-term outcomes in a multicenter observational registry including patients undergoing atrial tachycardia rhythm control.