Clinical Research Directory

Biospecimen Procurement for Head and Neck Disorders

Background: Researchers want to learn more about head and neck disorders. Understanding these disorders could help them find better treatments. To do this, they are collecting tissue samples for research. Objective: To create a repository of tissue samples and data to better study conditions of the head and neck. Eligibility: People who had or will have tissue samples taken because of a head or neck disorder. They must be ages 3 and older and not pregnant to join Part 2. Design: Participants will be screened with a questionnaire, medical history, and physical exam. Part 1. Participants will give permission for any of their tissue samples leftover from private care or other research protocols to be used. If participants tissue did not contain normal tissue or if they have a condition that suggests a genetic issue, they will be invited to join Part 2. Part 2: Participants will have additional samples collected. These could be: * Blood: Blood is drawn through a needle in the arm. * Cheek swab or brushing: A cotton swab or small brush is rubbed inside the cheek. * Saliva: They rinse their mouth with water and spit into a tube or cup. * Skin biopsy: They are injected with a numbing drug. A biopsy tool removes a small piece of skin. * Mucosal biopsy: They are injected in the mouth with a numbing medication. A small piece of tissue from the inside of the cheek is removed. Participants samples will be used for future research, including genetic testing. ...

Determinants of Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Preventive Photobiomodulation

The goal of this observational study is to identify factors associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis in adults with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy who receive preventive photobiomodulation (PBM) as part of their standard care. The main question it aims to answer is: which clinical, demographic, tumor-related, treatment-related and functional factors are associated with grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis (NCI-CTCAE v5.0) despite preventive PBM? Participants will receive their usual radiotherapy and their usual preventive PBM sessions (3 sessions per week throughout radiotherapy). In addition, for the purpose of the study, they will: * perform a 1-minute sit-to-stand test and a handgrip strength measurement at inclusion and at the end of radiotherapy; * complete the EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 quality-of-life questionnaire before radiotherapy, at mid-treatment and at the end of radiotherapy; * have standardized photographs taken of the irradiated skin. Skin toxicity will be graded at each PBM session.

Intratumoral N17350 in Advanced Solid Tumors

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if N17350 works to treat advanced solid tumors in adults. It will also learn about the safety of N17350 and help determine the best dose to use in future studies. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does N17350 cause tumors to shrink or stop growing in some participants with advanced solid tumors? 2. Are there any side effects for participants when taking N17350? 3. What is the safest dose of N17350 and the dose that should be used for further study? 4. Researchers will give N17350 directly into tumor lesions using a needle (intratumoral injection). This is an open-label study, meaning all participants will receive N17350 and there is no placebo. Participants will: 1. Receive injections of N17350 into tumor lesions every second week for 8 or 12 weeks 2. Visit the clinic regularly for checkups, blood tests, and monitoring for side effects 3. Have imaging scans (such as CT or MRI) to measure tumors and assess response 4. Provide blood samples and, when required, tumor samples to help researchers understand how N17350 affects the tumor and the immune system

Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Tumor Patients

Most newly diagnosed oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers are treated with radiochemotherapy with curative intent. If the field-set UP margins are broad, the consequence may be that quality of life is impaired. The study group of Nutting et al. (2023) investigated this year whether dysphagia-optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy can reduce the radiation dose to structures associated with dysphagia and aspiration and improve swallowing function compared to standard IMRT (Nutting C, Finneran L, Roe J, Petkar I, Rooney K, Hall E; DARS Triallist Group. Dysphagia-optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients with pharyngeal cancer - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Oct;24(10):e398. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00457-6. PMID: 37797636.) The study group concluded that the results suggest that dysphagia-optimized IMRT improves patient-reported swallowing function compared to standard IMRT. DO-IMRT should be considered the new standard of care for patients receiving radiotherapy for pharyngeal cancer, and ART could further improve outcomes.

Safety and Tolerability of the Use of Copaiba in Patients With Oral Cancer Submitted to Radiotherapy

This study aims to propose an alternative and auxiliary methodology for the prevention and treatment of Oral Mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing radiotherapy or radio and chemotherapy for head and neck neoplasms through the use of copaiba-based mouthwash, since the treatment that currently has proven efficacy for the prevention of OM(Low Power Laser Therapy) cannot be applied in tumor regions due to the risk of stimulating the tissue proliferation of malignant cells.

Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Maxillectomy Patients

The success of digitally fabricated obturator rehabilitation is determined not only by the prosthesis itself but also by the interaction between patient characteristics, oncologic history, prosthetic support, and three-dimensional defect complexity. Digital data obtained during prosthesis fabrication may therefore serve a dual purpose: to fabricate the prosthesis and to predict the patient's expected functional response.

Study of Safety and Tolerability of BCA101 Monotherapy and in Combination Therapy in Patients With EGFR-driven Advanced Solid Tumors

The investigational drug to be studied in this protocol, BCA101, is a first-in-class compound that targets both EGFR with TGFβ. Based on preclinical data, this bifunctional antibody may exert synergistic activity in patients with EGFR-driven tumors.

NIDCD Otolaryngology Clinical Protocol Biospecimen Bank

Background: Many disorders of the head and neck can affect a person s hearing; balance; smell; taste; swallowing; voice; or speech. These disorders include cancers and genetic and inflammatory diseases. To find better ways to diagnose and treat these disorders, researchers need to study tissues and other biological samples from people who have them. Objective: To collect biological samples for a repository that will be used for research. Eligibility: People of any age with a disorder of the head and neck that requires the taking of biological samples. The conditions may be any that affect hearing; balance; smell; taste; swallowing; voice; or speech. Design: Part 1: Participants will give permission for their leftover tissue samples to be used for research. These are tissue samples from the head and neck that were collected in the course of routine tests and care or other research studies. Information on each participant s age, diagnosis, and previous treatments will also be collected. Part 2: Some participants may be asked for more samples. All those aged 3 years or older will have a physical exam. They will provide blood and saliva samples. A cotton swab or brush will be used to collect cells from the inside of the cheek. Participants 18 years or older may have additional tests. They may provide nasal secretions: A piece of gelfoam or a sponge will be placed in the nose to soak up secretions for 5 to 10 minutes. They may have biopsies: Small samples of tissue will be cut from the skin and the tissue lining the mouth. Samples may be used for genetic testing.

Prophylactic Antibiotic Duration in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery (PROTECT-HN Trial)

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether giving antibiotics for 7 days after surgery, instead of the usual 24 hours, lowers the chance of wound infection in adults having major surgery for mouth or throat cancer. This includes operations that rebuild the area with tissue taken from another part of the body (free-flap reconstruction). The main question it aims to answer is: Does a 7-day course of antibiotics after surgery lower the number of patients who get a surgical wound infection within 30 days, compared with the standard 24-hour course? Other questions are: Does the longer course shorten the time spent in the intensive care unit and in the hospital? Does it lower the number of emergency room visits, hospital readmissions, and hospital costs within 30 days? Is the longer course safe, and does it cause more side effects? Researchers will compare two groups. Both groups receive the same antibiotic (ampicillin/sulbactam) through a vein before and during surgery. After surgery, one group continues the antibiotic for 24 hours (the current standard), and the other group continues it for 7 days, or until they go home if that is sooner. Participants will: Be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to one of the two groups Follow the hospital's usual care before surgery, including mouthwash, antiseptic body wash, and nasal ointment for 5 days Receive the antibiotic according to their group Be followed for 30 days after surgery to check for wound infection, other complications, return visits, and readmissions

Quad Shot Versus Split Course Radiotherapy in Incurable Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck cancer in its advanced, incurable stage causes severe symptoms such as pain, trouble swallowing, and bleeding. Palliative radiation therapy is frequently used to relieve these symptoms and improve the patient's quality of life. Currently, a standard treatment approach is the "Split Course" regimen, which takes several weeks and can cause side effects that are difficult for patients to tolerate. This study aims to evaluate a shorter, alternative radiation treatment called "Quad Shot." The hypothesis of this study is that the Quad Shot regimen will be as effective as the Split Course regimen in shrinking the tumor and controlling local symptoms, but will offer a better quality of life by reducing the overall treatment time and the severity of side effects. To test this, researchers will assign participants by chance to receive either the Quad Shot or the Split Course regimen. The research team will closely monitor tumor response, treatment side effects, and patients' quality of life for up to six months.

Pembrolizumab Combined With Cetuximab for Treatment of Recurrent/Metastatic Head & Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, multi-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with pembrolizumab and cetuximab for patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. There will be four patient cohorts, including a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve, cetuximab-naïve arm (Cohort 1), a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-refractory, cetuximab-naïve arm (Cohort 2), a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-refractory, cetuximab-refractory arm (Cohort 3), and a cutaneous HNSCC arm (Cohort 4). A total of 83 patients (33 in Cohort 1, 25 in Cohort 2, 15 in Cohort 3, and 10 in Cohort 4) will be eligible to enroll. Patients will be enrolled at 4 sites: UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, UC Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, and University of Washington Siteman Cancer Center.

Difficult Airway Management in Oncology: An International Delphi Consensus Study (DAMO)

Airway management in patients with cancer carries risks that general difficult-airway guidelines do not address. Tumour in the head, neck, or mediastinum can distort or narrow the airway; previous radiotherapy causes fibrosis and restricts neck movement; low platelet counts increase bleeding during instrumentation; and obstruction may sit below the point at which a breathing tube ends, so that intubation alone does not restore ventilation. Existing international airway guidelines are written for general populations and contain little cancer-specific guidance. This study uses a modified Delphi method to develop an international expert consensus statement on the prediction, preparation for, and management of the difficult airway in adults with cancer. An international panel of clinicians with expertise in anaesthesiology, intensive care, interventional pulmonology, head and neck surgery, and emergency medicine votes anonymously on a set of candidate statements across ten clinical domains, using a seven-point agreement scale with free-text comment. Voting takes place over a minimum of three rounds. Between rounds, panellists receive anonymised group results and a summary of comments, and statements are revised accordingly. Consensus is defined a priori as agreement by at least 80 percent of respondents together with a median score of 5 or above; strong consensus requires at least 90 percent agreement with a median of 6 or 7. Statements that do not reach consensus are reported as such and form a prioritised research agenda. Reporting follows the ACCORD reporting guideline for consensus methods.

HTL0039732 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumours

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate a new drug, HTL0039732, that will be administered on its own (as a monotherapy) and in combination with atezolizumab or with other approved anti-cancer therapies, in participants with advanced solid tumours.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Standard radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma typically requires daily treatments over 6 to 7 weeks. For older adults, these prolonged treatment schedules can cause substantial physical fatigue, travel burden, and treatment interruptions. Hypofractionated radiotherapy delivers higher doses of radiation per session over a shorter total treatment time (approximately 3 weeks), potentially limiting tumor cell regrowth, easing logistical demands on patients, and improving completion rates. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared with standard normofractionated radiotherapy in older adults with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eligible participants aged 65 years and older will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either: * Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (Intervention): External beam radiotherapy delivered via image-guided intensity-modulated techniques (IMRT/VMAT) once daily over approximately 3 weeks (45 Gy in 15 fractions for definitive therapy, or 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions for postoperative/adjuvant therapy). * Standard Normofractionated Radiotherapy (Comparator): External beam radiotherapy delivered once daily using conventional fractionation schedules over approximately 6 to 7 weeks according to institutional clinical standards. Participants will be monitored weekly during radiation treatment and followed for up to 1 year post-treatment. The primary outcome is locoregional control, with secondary outcomes assessing overall survival, disease-free survival, acute and late toxicities graded by CTCAE version 6.0, and health-related quality of life.

First in Human Study of AZD9592 in Solid Tumors

This is a first-in-human (FIH) Phase I, multi-center, open-label, study of AZD9592, in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study consists of several study modules, each evaluating the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, anti-tumor activity, and immunogenicity of AZD9592, as monotherapy or in combination with anti-cancer agents.

Evaluation of Adherence to Rehabilitation: Autonomous and Guided, in the Observation and Treatment Response of Head and Neck Lymphedema in Neoplasms During Radiotherapy

Head and neck lymphedema is a common complication after treatment for head and neck cancer. It can cause swelling of the face and neck, discomfort, reduced neck and jaw mobility, swallowing difficulties, and a negative impact on quality of life. One usual treatment approach includes manual lymphatic drainage, exercises, skin care, and the use of a compression garment worn for several hours each day. However, wearing a compression garment for a long period may be difficult for patients because of discomfort, appearance, social constraints, or practical limitations, which may reduce adherence to treatment. The ARAGORN study aims to determine whether a more autonomous rehabilitation program, based on patient education, self-drainage, targeted exercises, and short-duration compression bandaging performed twice daily, leads to better treatment adherence than the usual recommended approach using prolonged compression garment wear. The main question of the study is whether patients receiving the autonomous, guided rehabilitation program are more likely to adhere to their prescribed lymphedema treatment over the radiotherapy period than patients receiving the usual recommended care. The study hypothesis is that a patient-centered, self-management approach may improve adherence by making treatment easier to integrate into daily life, while maintaining potential benefits on swelling, symptoms, function, and quality of life.

Study of Biological Effect of Tarceva (OSI-774) for Patients Stricken by ENT Epidermoid Carcinoma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biological effect of Tarceva (OSI-774) from an inhibition of EGF tumor receptor tyrosine kinase activity's point of view, for patients who are carriers of head and neck epidermoid carcinoma.

Photobiomodulation Therapy Plus M-health in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: LAXER Study

The Photobiomodulation therapy could have positive effects on quality of life and oral health in head and neck cancer survivors post-radiotherapy. The improvement in quality of life will be maintained after a follow-up period.

Tai Chi for Cancer-Related Fatigue During Radiotherapy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

This prospective, randomized controlled study will evaluate whether a Tai Chi exercise program can help reduce cancer-related fatigue in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. A total of 116 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a Tai Chi intervention group or a control group. Participants in the Tai Chi group will receive usual cancer care together with a 12-week Yang-style 16-form Tai Chi program. The exercise program will begin during radiotherapy preparation and will be adjusted according to the participant's treatment phase and physical condition. Participants in the control group will receive usual care, health education, and activity recording. The primary outcome is the change in cancer-related fatigue from baseline to within 7 days after completion of radiotherapy, measured using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) global score. The study will also assess fatigue at week 12 and functional exercise capacity using the 6-minute walk test.

The SWOAR Trial Sparing of Swallowing and Aspiration Related Organs at Risk & Submandibular Gland With Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Standard IMRT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

The aim of SWOAR TRIAL is to test sparing of Dysphagia/ Aspiration risk structures (DARS) and contra lateral submandibular gland by IMRT. HNSCC of the oropharynx, larynx and the hypopharynx treated with radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy will be included in the trial. Patients will be randomized to SWOAR IMRT or standard IMRT. Swallowing function will be evaluated the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scoring. Difference in the mean composite score of MDADI, a patient-reported outcome, at 6 months post radiotherapy is the primary outcome of the trial. Secondary Objectives include longitudinal assessment of aspiration prevention as evaluated by FEES by the 8 point penetration-aspiration score. Swallowing function, will be assessed by using the MDADI at baseline, at completion of CRT/RT, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Assessment of acute and late toxicity assessed at baseline, weekly during radiotherapy and then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post treatment as per RTOG and LENT SOMA score, respectively. Treatment outcomes will be assessed in terms of loco-regional tumor recurrence and overall survival, assessed at follow-up visits 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post treatment and then annually until 5 years post treatment.

A Preregistered Multi-Cohort Evaluation of the FATHOM AI System for Molecular Testing Prioritization to Support Clinical Trial Enrollment

Many clinical trials evaluating cancer treatments require patients to undergo testing for specific molecular markers as part of eligibility screening, typically using immunohistochemistry or sequencing. Because relatively few patients may carry a required marker, trial investigators often test large numbers of patients to identify the few who may ultimately qualify for enrollment. Pathology laboratories routinely produce hematoxylin-and-eosin (H\&E) slides during cancer diagnosis. Pathology foundation models-large neural networks pretrained on millions of histology images-have shown promise in predicting molecular characteristics from these slides. Researchers can use these models to build classifiers that predict specific molecular markers and prioritize patients for confirmatory testing. This study evaluates FATHOM (Facilitating Accrual through Tumor Histology and Omics Matching), an autonomous research system powered by large multimodal models. Its agents read registered clinical trial records, identify molecular markers used as enrollment criteria, build prediction models using pathology foundation models, select the individual models or model combinations that best meet prespecified criteria, set their decision thresholds, and determine whether to deploy them. Together, a prediction model, its decision threshold, and the decision to deploy it constitute an AI prediction policy. Before FATHOM runs, the investigators preregister the clinical trial records that its agents may read, the cutoff date that defines which trial information they may use, the rules governing the agents, and the analysis plan. The system timestamps and locks each policy immediately after an agent produces it. The investigators then apply the policies to archived patient slides and compare their predictions with existing molecular marker results. The primary outcome is the proportion of prespecified evaluation scenarios in which an agent-generated policy, compared with universal molecular testing, either enriches the population selected for confirmatory testing with marker-positive patients or safely spares patients from confirmatory testing while meeting prespecified performance criteria. This study analyzes existing pathology images and clinical trial records only. It does not enroll or contact patients, influence patient care, or affect participation in any clinical trial.

Durvalumab (MEDI4736) With Cetuximab in Previously Treated Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The purpose of this research study is to test the combination of the anti-cancer drugs durvalumab, the study drug, and cetuximab as a treatment for metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer. Participants will receive both durvalumab and cetuximab.

Basket Study of Entrectinib (RXDX-101) for the Treatment of Patients With Solid Tumors Harboring NTRK 1/2/3 (Trk A/B/C), ROS1, or ALK Gene Rearrangements (Fusions)

This is an open-label, multicenter, global Phase 2 basket study of entrectinib (RXDX-101) for the treatment of patients with solid tumors that harbor an NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, or ALK gene fusion. Patients will be assigned to different baskets according to tumor type and gene fusion.

Topical Boswellia Serrata 2% to Prevent Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer

This study evaluates a topical 2% Boswellia serrata (Indian olibanum) gum-resin cream for the prevention of acute radiation-induced dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Participants in the intervention group apply the cream to the radiation field twice daily throughout the radiotherapy course; the control group receives no preventive topical treatment (rescue treatment only if skin reactions occur). The two co-primary outcomes are the proportion of patients who require rescue treatment (e.g., topical corticosteroids or other topical interventions) for skin reactions, and the proportion whose skin condition is rated "improved" or "in remission" versus "unchanged" or "worsened" on a standardized change-of-condition assessment. Secondary outcomes include time to onset of radiodermatitis, maximal severity (RTOG and CTCAE grading), patient-reported symptoms (pain, itching, burning) and quality of life, radiotherapy interruptions due to skin toxicity, and safety/tolerability.