Clinical Research Directory

A Study to Assess Safety of Teclistamab in Indian Participants With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety of teclistamab in routine clinical practice when given as monotherapy in Indian participants with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) (that is, a blood cancer that comes back after treatment or does not respond to treatment) who have previously received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor and an anti-cluster of differentiation (CD)38 antibody (is a protein that fights infection) and whose disease have progressed on the last therapy.

A Study of Subcutaneous Daratumumab Regimens in Combination With Bispecific T Cell Redirection Antibodies for the Treatment of Participants With Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to identify recommended Phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) for each treatment combination (between daratumumab plus talquetamab and teclistamab plus daratumumab with or without pomalidomide) and to characterize the safety of each RP2D for selected treatment combinations.

A Study of JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Participants With Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate of participants who receive JNJ-68284528.

A Study Comparing Talquetamab in Combination With Daratumumab or in Combination With Daratumumab and Pomalidomide Versus Daratumumab in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Multiple Myeloma That Returns After Treatment or is Resistant to Treatment

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of talquetamab subcutaneous(ly) (SC) in combination with daratumumab SC and pomalidomide (Tal-DP) and talquetamab SC in combination with daratumumab SC (Tal-D), respectively, with daratumumab SC in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd).

A Study Comparing JNJ-79635322 and an Anti-B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)xCD3 Bispecific Antibody in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well JNJ-79635322 works when compared with an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)xCD3 bispecific antibody.

A Study of JNJ-79635322 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well JNJ-79635322 works (efficacy) in participants with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM; a cancer that forms in a type of white blood cells called a plasma cell. Cancer is called relapsed if it comes back after treatment and is called 'refractory' if does not respond to treatment) who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy.

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Cevostamab in Prior B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-Exposed Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of cevostamab in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) via intravenous (IV) infusion.

A Study of MBS314 for Injectionin Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

This is a Phase I/II, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and efficacy of MBS314, a novel asymmetric trivalent trispecific humanized antibody targeting GPRC5D, BCMA and CD3, administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The investigational drug is MBS314 for Injection (high-concentration lyophilized formulation, 90 mg/vial, reconstituted to 90 mg/mL); this study is the first-in-human (FIH) study of this formulation. The study is divided into 2 parts: a dose escalation part (Phase I) and a dose expansion part (Phase II). In Phase I, eligible participants will be sequentially assigned to 1 of the 3 planned dose cohorts and receive MBS314 by SC injection using a step-up dosing (SUD) strategy, and dose escalation follows the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design with a target toxicity rate of 33%. In Phase II, 1 to 3 dose groups will be selected based on Phase I results to further evaluate the efficacy of MBS314 at the recommended dose(s).

Phase 1 Study of 6MW5311 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Blood Cancers

To assess safety and tolerability at increasing dose levels of 6MW5311 in successive cohorts of participants with MM, AML and CMML in order to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and select the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) or the recommended expansion dose (RED).

A Study Comparing Daratumumab, VELCADE (Bortezomib), Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VRd) With VELCADE, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) in Participants With Untreated Multiple Myeloma and for Whom Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant is Not Planned as Initial Therapy

The purpose of this study to determine if the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRd) will improve overall minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate compared with VRd alone.

A Study of Daratumumab

The purpose of this study is to provide ongoing access to study treatments for participants with multiple myeloma or smoldering multiple myeloma benefiting from treatment in certain Janssen Research and Development (R\&D) studies that use daratumumab as part of the study treatment regimen: access for all participants regardless of treatment group in daratumumab studies and access to participants in daratumumab-containing arms in the non-daratumumab studies will be allowed from studies which have reached clinical cutoff for final analysis. Certain long-term safety data will continue to be collected from study participants.

A Study Evaluating the Prophylactic Use of Tocilizumab to Prevent Cytokine Release Syndrome With Ramantamig Administration in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to find out whether giving a single dose of tocilizumab before treatment with ramantamig can help prevent or reduce the severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) within 28 days from ramantamig, compared to participants who receive placebo. CRS is an acute inflammatory reaction that can occur during treatment and may be associated with flu-like or other systemic symptoms, such as fever and tiredness.

A Study of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRd) Followed by Cilta-cel, a CAR-T Therapy Directed Against BCMA Versus VRd Followed by Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Therapy in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma for Whom ASCT is Not Planned as Initial Therapy

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRd) induction followed by a single administration of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) versus VRd induction followed by Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma participants for whom ASCT is not planned as initial therapy in terms of Progression Free Survival (PFS).

A Study of Ramantamig Plus Daratumumab Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) or Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Participants With NDMM For Whom Stem Cell Transplant is Not Planned

The main purpose of this study is to see how well a new treatment ramantamig-D works compared to standard treatments that is either DVRd or DRd on progression-free survival (PFS; time until a participant's disease worsens) and 12-month minimal residue disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) rate (percentage of participants in whom cancer cells are not detected) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM; an initial stage of blood cancer that forms in a type of white blood cells \[WBCs\] called plasma cells) for whom stem cell transplant is not planned as initial therapy.

Gene Therapy Follow-up Protocol for People Previously Enrolled in CAR-T Cell Studies

Background: \- Gene therapy is a way to treat or prevent disease using genes. It is monitored very closely by regulators because there can be long-term, unexpected side effects. NIH is required to try to contact people who have been treated with gene therapy at least annually for up to 15 years. This is to see if they have had any bad side effects. This trial does not include any therapy and is only for patients previously treated on gene-therapy trials at the NCI Surgery Branch who are no longer enrolled on their original gene therapy clinical trial. Objective: \- To collect of long-term follow-up data on people who have been in gene transfer studies. This follow-up is required by regulators. Eligibility: \- People age 18 and older who have been in a previous NCI Surgery Branch gene therapy research study. Design: * After they get the genetically modified cells, participants will: * Have blood drawn 3, 6, and 12 months later. * Have an annual clinic visit for the next 4 years. They will have a physical exam. They will answer questions about any signs of neurological, autoimmune, or blood disorders, or any new cancers. Blood may be drawn. * Be called or emailed annually for the next 10 years. They will answer health questions. Blood samples may need to be taken. * Participants will be asked for their current address and phone number. They will also be asked for the address and phone number of 1 or 2 people who will know their whereabouts. One of these should be a family member if possible, * At the time of the participant s death, researchers will request permission from their family for an autopsy.

A Study Comparing Talquetamab Plus Pomalidomide, Talquetamab Plus Teclistamab, and Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone or Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Myeloma Who Have Received an Anti-CD38 Antibody and Lenalidomide

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of either talquetamab plus pomalidomide (Tal-P) or talquetamab plus teclistamab (Tal-Tec) with elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EPd) or pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd).

A Study of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel and Talquetamab for the Treatment of Participants With High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to define the safety of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-cel) and Talquetamab in participants with high-risk multiple myeloma (MM).

A Study of Talquetamab With Other Anticancer Therapies in Participants With Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and tolerability of talquetamab when administered in different combination regimens and to identify the safe dose(s) of talquetamab combination regimens.

A Study of Different Sequences of Cilta-cel, Talquetamab in Combination With Daratumumab and Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab Following Induction With Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Standard-risk Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of response (how effectively treatment is working) with signs of potential cure at 5 years after the start of induction treatment. This is defined as a composite of sustained (at least 2 years) minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with complete response/stringent complete response (CR/sCR) and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan that does not show any signs of cancer at 5 years. MRD negativity and CR/sCR is defined as no detectable signs of remaining cancer cells after the treatment. This study will also characterize how well the treatments administered work in the study through progression-free survival (PFS). PFS is defined as the length of time during and after the treatment of a disease, that a participant lives with the disease, but it does not get worse.

Combination Therapy (Mirdametinib and Sirolimus) for RAS Mutated Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a type of blood cancer that affects a person s immunity. MM returns after treatment (relapse) in almost all people; MM may also not respond to initial treatment (refractory). Many people with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) also have changes in their KRAS and NRAS genes. Researchers want to try a new drug treatment that targets cancer with these changed genes. Objective: To test 2 drugs (mirdametinib and sirolimus) in people with RRMM. Eligibility: People aged 18 and older with RRMM who have changes in their KRAS or NRAS genes. Design: Participants will be screened. They will have blood tests and imaging scans. They will have an eye exam and a test of their heart function. They will need to provide proof of their disease status and of their KRAS or NRAS status. If neither is available, the tests will be repeated. Participants will have a bone marrow biopsy: A needle will be inserted into a hipbone to draw out some soft tissue. This study will be done in two parts. In the first part of this study, we will find a safe dose of mirdametinib combined with sirolimus. In the second part, we will learn more about how mirdametinib combined with sirolimus may work against RRMM. Mirdametinib (capsules) and sirolimus (tablets) are taken by mouth. Participants will take both drugs at home on a 4-week cycle. They will take mirdametinib twice a day for the first 3 weeks of each cycle. They will take sirolimus once a day, every day, during each cycle. Participants will have study visits once a week during the first cycle, and then on the first day of subsequent cycles. Blood, heart, imaging scans, and other tests will be repeated. Treatment with the study drugs will go on for 1 year. Then participants will have follow-up visits every 3 months for 4 more years.

A Study Comparing JNJ-68284528, a CAR-T Therapy Directed Against B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA), Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) or Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (DPd) in Participants With Relapsed and Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) with standard therapy, either Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) or Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (DPd).

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well (efficacy) cilta-cel works when given with a fludarabine-free lymphodepletion regimen (a process of reducing the number of lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell in the body, typically through chemotherapy), or an alternative administration of cilta-cel infusion following a cyclophosphamide and fludarabine lymphodepletion regimen.

A Study of Teclistamab With Other Anticancer Therapies in Participants With Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and tolerability of teclistamab when administered in different combination regimen and to identify the optimal dose(s) of teclistamab combination regimens.

The Value of a Tailored-based, Exercise Program for Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: a Pilot Randomized Trial

This multicenter, prospective, pilot randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 16-week structured exercise program (SEP) in patients with hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. A total of 75 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a supervised exercise intervention or a control group receiving usual care and general advice on physical activity. The intervention consists of a personalized, hybrid exercise program combining supervised home- and gym-based training, aerobic and resistance exercises, balance and stretching activities, and behavioral counseling. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of the intervention in terms of adherence to the exercise program and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives include evaluating intervention-related adverse events, patient-reported burden, health-related quality of life, fatigue, physical fitness, anthropometric parameters, and physical activity levels. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, approximately 8 weeks, 16 weeks (end of intervention), and 24 weeks after randomization.